Property developers exploit Victoria donation loophole with network of companies

Three developers used 12 separate companies to donate $58,800 to the Victorian Liberal Party in a week, staying within the law by keeping each payment under the cap.

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Three wealthy property developers, including the son of a $400 million nut king, used a network of jointly owned companies to donate $44,100 to the Victorian Liberal Party in a single week, a move which did not breach the state's donation laws because each payment came from a separate legal entity. The cash windfall has exposed a potential loophole in Victoria's political donation scheme that could allow other wealthy donors to funnel tens of thousands of dollars to political parties and independent candidates using a similar setup.

Between late April and early May, the Victorian branch of the Liberals received a total of $58,800 from a dozen businesses all named variations of Mensch Investments, Victorian Electoral Commission (VEC) records show.

Nine of the companies are named Mensch Investments Industrial, and are differentiated only by a single number from SL7-1 through to SL7-9. All nine have the same directors: businessmen David Scalzo, Anthony Caligiuri and Eli Goldfinger. Caligiuri and Scalzo are the shareholders of each of the companies, which are all registered at the address of Goldfinger's St Kilda Road advisory business. Collectively, the nine businesses donated $44,100 in a single week.

The other three companies are named Mensch Investments Partnership, and numbered one through three. Corporate records identify them as SG Mensch Investments companies, with Scalzo listed as the sole director of each and all registered to the address of his South Melbourne office. Each of the three companies individually donated $4900.

Between April 30 and May 4, the combined total of the donations by the 12 companies gave a $58,800 cash boost to the Liberal Party.

At the time the donations were made, Victoria's political donations were capped at $5190 from a single donor or organisation over a four-year parliamentary term. The cap applies to entities that are "related", meaning businesses that are connected by parent companies, subsidiaries or holding companies can collectively still only donate up to the cap. But companies are not necessarily considered related simply because they share the same directors.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The loophole could allow any wealthy donor to multiply their political influence by splitting donations across shell companies, undermining the intent of Victoria's donation caps.
  • It raises questions about the adequacy of the related-entity rules in Victoria's political donations scheme.
  • The disclosure may increase public pressure on the Victorian government to tighten donation laws.

Background

Victoria introduced caps on political donations in an effort to reduce the influence of money in politics. The scheme limits donations from a single donor to $5190 over four years. However, the laws define "related" entities narrowly, focusing on parent-subsidiary structures rather than common directorship or beneficial ownership, creating openings for donors to circumvent the cap.

Key Perspectives

Victorian Liberal Party: The party received the donations and has not indicated any intention to return them. The donations appear to comply with the letter of the law. Donors (David Scalzo, Anthony Caligiuri, Eli Goldfinger): They have used multiple companies under common control to make donations, staying within legal limits per entity, but effectively exceeding the intended single-donor cap. Critics of the scheme: They argue that shared directorship and common ownership should trigger the related-entity provisions, and that the current definition leaves a clear loophole for coordinated donations.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Victorian Electoral Commission reviews the Mensch Investments donations and issues guidance on related-entity rules.
  • Any legislative response from the Victorian government to close the loophole.
  • Potential similar donation structures used by other donors in future disclosure rounds.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.