Redeemer Baptist School flagged 15 times for child harm, never visited by authorities, inquiry reveals

Parliamentary inquiry into the Parramatta private school exposes failures in NSW child protection agencies

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
A parliamentary inquiry has revealed that the Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) received 15 risk of significant harm (ROSH) notifications involving children from Redeemer Baptist School in Parramatta since 2004, but never conducted a single face-to-face field assessment. The school, run by a church banned from caring for children, faces allegations of systemic abuse, extreme control and forced communal living, as former students and staff give evidence of sexual, physical, emotional and spiritual harm.

The inquiry into Redeemer Baptist School, triggered by a joint investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald and 60 Minutes, has laid bare failings in New South Wales' child protection system. New documents tabled at the inquiry show that the DCJ relied solely on phone assessments and referrals to other agencies to clear child welfare reports concerning the school, despite whistleblowers and former students alleging systemic control, abuse and forced communal living.

According to answers provided by the DCJ on notice, the department received 15 ROSH reports involving children enrolled at the school over a 22-year period. Under NSW law, a child is deemed at risk of significant harm if there are concerns relating to assault, sexual abuse, psychological harm or neglect. The DCJ declined to confirm under which specific categories the reports fell.

Former staff and students have told the inquiry they suffered sexual, physical, emotional and spiritual abuse, and have urged the government to classify the school and its associated church as a system of group-based coercive control. Some have alleged in the inquiry that it amounts to a cult. The reports detailed allegations that the school denies teachers wages, enforces extreme control over members, dictates students' underwear choices and forces children to live with staff.

The inquiry continues, with further evidence expected to examine how the state's child protection agencies handled warnings about the school over more than two decades.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The revelations raise serious questions about the effectiveness of NSW child protection agencies in responding to risks within institutional settings, particularly religious schools with a history of regulatory action.
  • For families, the case underscores potential gaps in oversight that may leave children vulnerable to harm when authorities rely on remote assessments rather than on-site inspections.
  • The inquiry's outcome could lead to legislative changes in how group-based coercive control is defined and how child protection notifications are triaged.

Background

Redeemer Baptist School is a private school in Parramatta, Sydney, run by a church that has been banned from caring for children. The parliamentary inquiry was prompted by a joint media investigation that brought allegations of abuse and extreme control to public attention. Former students and staff have described a culture of coercive control, with the school dictating many aspects of students' personal lives.

Key Perspectives

Former students and staff: They have given evidence of enduring sexual, physical, emotional and spiritual abuse. They are calling for the school and its associated church to be formally recognised as a system of group-based coercive control under NSW law. Department of Communities and Justice: The department disclosed that it received 15 ROSH notifications but conducted no face-to-face field assessments, relying instead on phone assessments and referrals. It has not explained why on-site visits were not triggered. Critics and whistleblowers: They argue that the reliance on remote assessments is inadequate for allegations involving institutional settings where power imbalances and group pressure may prevent victims from disclosing openly.

What to Watch

  • Whether the inquiry recommends changes to the mandatory triage process for ROSH reports in institutional settings.
  • The government's response to calls for a new legal definition of group-based coercive control.
  • Any further evidence of missed opportunities by regulatory agencies to intervene earlier.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.