Retired US generals urge Pentagon to cancel 'barbaric' execution livestream

72 former military leaders argue public broadcast of Nidal Hasan's firing squad execution would violate the Constitution and turn a mass killer into a martyr

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A group of 72 retired US generals, admirals and other high-ranking military officers has called on the Pentagon to abandon plans to livestream the December execution of Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist who killed 13 soldiers at Fort Hood, warning the broadcast would be a 'barbaric abuse of authority' and hand America's enemies propaganda.

The former military leaders, including 45 generals, 12 admirals and several former judge advocates general, released an open letter on Wednesday urging President Donald Trump and Congress to stop the broadcast. The Pentagon announced last week that the execution by firing squad, scheduled for 3 December, would be shown publicly.

"We ask the President, our Congressional representatives, and our fellow citizens to act to prevent this barbaric abuse of authority," the letter states. The signatories said they did not oppose the death penalty itself but argued the livestream would violate constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment, turning a "solemn and grave punishment" into "a carnival for the enjoyment of voyeurs and spectators."

President Trump said last week he "absolutely" approved of the livestream plan, but according to CBS News, the BBC's US media partner, some administration officials are now leaning against it and Trump had not made a final decision as of Tuesday. Lawmakers from both parties, as well as religious leaders, have also criticised the plan.

The retired officers warned that broadcasting the execution would "taint the honor of the military" and be used by enemies to "stoke hatred, harm American soldiers and citizens in the future, and will ensure that Hasan becomes a martyr for attacking and killing his fellow soldiers."

Hasan, who now uses a wheelchair after being shot during the attack, said in court he carried out the Fort Hood shooting, the deadliest non-combat attack on a US base, believing he was protecting Muslims and the Taliban from the US military.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Pentagon's decision to livestream a federal execution would be unprecedented and raises significant constitutional and ethical questions.
  • A public broadcast risks inflaming extremism and providing propaganda material for adversaries.
  • The divided reaction within the Trump administration and across party lines suggests the outcome remains uncertain.

Background

Nidal Hasan was convicted and sentenced to death for the 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, in which he killed 13 unarmed soldiers. The attack was the deadliest on a US military base by a fellow service member. Hasan is scheduled to be executed by firing squad on 3 December, the first federal execution of this method in decades. The Pentagon's plan to broadcast it live has drawn criticism from both sides of politics.

Key Perspectives

[Retired military leaders]: The 72 signatories argue the livestream violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment and would degrade the dignity of the military. They warn it would turn Hasan into a martyr and be used by enemies to recruit against the US. [Trump administration]: President Trump initially expressed strong support for the broadcast, saying he "absolutely" approved. However, some administration officials are reportedly now leaning against it, and no final decision has been made. [Lawmakers and religious leaders]: Criticism has come from both parties and faith groups, questioning the propriety of making an execution a public spectacle.

What to Watch

  • President Trump's final decision on whether to proceed with the livestream.
  • Potential legal challenges from Hasan's lawyers or civil liberties groups.
  • Reaction from the military community and veterans' organisations.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe