Robe mayor faces censure after probe finds she told staffer to 'lose some weight'

Lisa Ruffell 'strongly' disputes Kelledy Jones investigation and questions its process

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
The mayor of the District Council of Robe in regional South Australia will face a censure vote on Monday night after an independent investigation found she breached behavioural standards, including telling a staff member they "needs to go back to netball and lose some weight".

Lisa Ruffell, who has led the council on the Limestone Coast, about 350 kilometres south-east of Adelaide, since 2023, was investigated over allegations that she undermined the professional reputation of council employees, contributed to distress, created governance instability and contributed to psychosocial risks for staff.

The Kelledy Jones Lawyers investigation, published in summary form on Wednesday as part of papers for a special council meeting, found multiple instances of Ms Ruffell criticising council staff in public settings. At a community photo shoot for council grant recipients, she told one staff member they "needs to go back to netball and lose some weight". At a meeting with state government representatives unrelated to a particular asset, she told an employee the asset could be fixed "if it wasn't for your big fat salary".

The investigation also found Ms Ruffell discussed council business and employee matters with community members, including describing employees as "lazy" and saying "they don't do anything". Investigators described Ms Ruffell as "dismissive" in meetings, saying she would "roll her eyes" while staff spoke, and reviewed emails they described as "rude, undermining and disrespectful".

Ms Ruffell was first made aware of the allegations in February and responded a month later, the investigation stated. The matter was referred to the local government Behavioural Standards Board, which recommended the council contract independent lawyers to conduct the investigation.

Ms Ruffell disputes the findings in full. She submitted the report "does not adequately identify the evidence relied on" and that "adverse witness material was not provided to her in full".

She told the ABC she would wait until Monday's meeting to comment further, but "strongly" disputed the investigation's findings and had concerns about its process.

"I am also disappointed that the publicly available meeting papers contain only the investigator's summary, rather than the full report," she said. "I believe the community deserves a fuller understanding of the material being relied upon."

Ms Ruffell said she had sought informal resolution and mediation "from the outset" and that the decision to pursue a formal investigation "was not mine". The investigation noted a failure to come to a private resolution over the complaints necessitated them being discussed at a public council meeting.

The investigation will be tabled at Monday night's council meeting, where Ms Ruffell will be absent from discussion due to conflict of interest protocols. Elected members will vote on whether to censure her.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Council members will vote on whether to formally censure the sitting mayor, a public sanction that carries reputational and political weight.
  • The case tests how South Australia's behavioural standards framework for elected officials operates when informal resolution fails.
  • For council staff, the findings describe conduct said to have caused distress and psychosocial risk, an issue of growing concern across local government.

Background

South Australian councils hold elected members to behavioural standards, with complaints able to be referred to the Behavioural Standards Board. In this case the board recommended the council engage independent lawyers, leading to the Kelledy Jones investigation. Ms Ruffell, who has led the District Council of Robe since 2023, disputes all findings. The investigation summary was published ahead of a special council meeting on Monday night.

Key Perspectives

Lisa Ruffell: Disputes the findings in full and has raised concerns about the process, including that only the investigator's summary was made public rather than the full report, and that adverse witness material was not provided to her in full. She says she sought informal resolution and mediation from the outset. The council and investigators: The Kelledy Jones Lawyers investigation found multiple breaches of behavioural standards, including public criticism of staff, and noted that a private resolution could not be reached, requiring public discussion of the complaints. Council staff: The investigation was ordered after allegations that employees had their professional reputations undermined, experienced distress and were exposed to psychosocial risks.

What to Watch

  • The censure vote at Monday night's council meeting, which Ms Ruffell will not attend due to conflict of interest protocols.
  • Whether the full investigation report is released, which Ms Ruffell has argued the community should see.
  • Any further action by the Behavioural Standards Board or state regulators after the council's decision.

Sources

Checked

11 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 8 supported.

Show each claim
  1. Partly supportedThe headline says Ruffell “faces censure” after the probe, while the council is to vote on whether to censure her.Just In: “There, elected members will vote on whether to censure Ms Ruffell.”
  2. SupportedThe probe found Ruffell told a staff member to “lose some weight”.Just In: “including that Ms Ruffell said a staff member “needs to go back to netball and lose some weight””
  3. Partly supportedThe investigation found Ruffell breached behavioural standards.Just In: “an investigation into alleged breaches of behavioural standards has found.”
  4. Partly supportedThe summary says Ruffell strongly disputes the investigation and questions its process.Just In: “she “strongly” disputed the investigation’s findings and had concerns about its process.”
  5. SupportedAt a community photo shoot for council grant recipients, Ruffell told a staff member they “needs to go back to netball and lose some weight”.Just In: “Ms Ruffell said a staff member “needs to go back to netball and lose some weight” while at a community photo shoot for council grant recipients.”
  6. SupportedAt a meeting with state government representatives about an unrelated asset, Ruffell said it could be fixed “if it wasn't for your big fat salary”.Just In: “telling one employee an asset could be fixed “if it wasn’t for your big fat salary” while at a meeting with state government representatives unrelated to that asset.”
  7. SupportedThe investigation found Ruffell discussed council business and employee matters with community members, describing employees as “lazy” and saying “they don't do anything”.Just In: “Ms Ruffell was also found to have discussed council business and employee matters with community members, including describing employees as “lazy” and saying “they don’t do anything”.”
  8. SupportedInvestigators described Ruffell as “dismissive”, said she would “roll her eyes” while staff spoke, and reviewed emails described as “rude, undermining and disrespectful”.Just In: “the investigation described Ms Ruffell as “dismissive” in meetings and would “roll her eyes” while staff spoke. Investigators also reviewed “rude, undermining and disrespectful” emails sent by Ms Ruffell to employees.”
  9. SupportedRuffell was first made aware of the allegations in February and responded a month later.Just In: “The investigation stated Ms Ruffell was first made aware of the allegations in February, before she responded a month later.”
  10. SupportedRuffell said the report did not adequately identify the evidence relied on and that adverse witness material was not provided to her in full.Just In: “she submitted “the report does not adequately identify the evidence relied on” and “that adverse witness material was not provided to her in full”.”
  11. SupportedThe investigation will be tabled at Monday night's meeting, and Ruffell will be absent from discussion under conflict-of-interest protocols.Just In: “The investigation will be tabled to a council meeting on Monday night, where Ms Ruffell will be absent from discussion due to conflict of interest protocols.”

Zotpaper

Written by June Katz on the Australia & local desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source8 of 11 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe