Shakespeare confirmed as main author of Edward III, study finds Marlowe collaboration

Computerised analysis finds the 1596 play was written with Christopher Marlowe

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time4 min
Sources2 outlets
New computerised linguistic research has concluded beyond any reasonable doubt that William Shakespeare was the principal author of the anonymous 1596 history play Edward III, and that it was written in collaboration with Christopher Marlowe, a claim made seriously for the first time. The finding, described by researchers as having massive implications for both playwrights' canons, will be published in the Shakespeare Quarterly later this year.

New computerised linguistic research has concluded beyond any reasonable doubt that William Shakespeare was the principal author of the history play Edward III, and that the play was a collaboration with Christopher Marlowe, the first time Marlowe's presence in the work has been seriously argued.

Edward III was published anonymously in 1596, and scholars have long suspected that Shakespeare wrote at least a few of its scenes. Dr Rory Loughnane, a reader in early modern studies at the University of Kent and general editor of the Oxford Marlowe editorial project, said the new analysis pushed the case beyond any reasonable doubt. "That's the new finding, that both Shakespeare, now confirmed beyond doubt, and Marlowe, unexpectedly found for the first time, are present in the play, and therefore it represents a newly found collaboration between the two," he said.

Loughnane, who co-authored the research with Brett Greatley-Hirsch, a professor of renaissance literature and textual studies at the University of Leeds, said the discovery had "massive implications for our understanding of the relationship between the two most important dramatists of this period. This changes both the Shakespeare canon and the Marlowe canon and will be of significant international interest."

The researchers used several forms of computerised linguistic analysis, comparing Edward III with works securely attributed to 10 dramatists active between the late 1580s and the mid-1590s. In one test, 23 segments, described as "the lion's share," were identified as written by Shakespeare and nine segments as written by Marlowe, whose works include Doctor Faustus. Rather than assigning individual lines, the analysis examined patterns of language and the distribution of marker words such as "martial," which are typical of Marlowe's plays.

The analysis identifies a speech at the start of scene 13, in which a sudden darkening of the sky alarms the French camp and King Jean says "A sudden darkness hath defaced the sky," as Shakespeare's. A speech from the play's final scene, beginning "Great servitor to bloody Mars in arms, / The Frenchman's terror and his country's fame," is attributed to Marlowe.

Greatley-Hirsch said the strength of the case lay in the convergence of different tests. "What makes the evidence particularly compelling is that we're not relying on a single verbal parallel or statistical test. Different forms of analysis, looking at different features of the language, appear to repeatedly distinguish Marlowe's writing from Shakespeare's within the play."

Edward III did not appear in the 1623 First Folio of Shakespeare's plays. Loughnane had edited the play for the 2016 New Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Works, acknowledging that a couple of scenes were probably his. The new study follows a 2016 finding that Marlowe was a co-author of Shakespeare's three Henry VI plays, indicating what Loughnane described as "a more sustained writing relationship in their mid-to-late 20s." Marlowe died in 1593 aged 29. Loughnane said the pair were not simply rivals. "We have become accustomed to thinking of Marlowe and Shakespeare as rivals... But we now know that their relationship was much more complicated than that."

Loughnane acknowledged a caveat: Shakespeare's authorship of some segments "may overlap with bits of writing he did not do." The full research is due to be published in the Shakespeare Quarterly later this year. Loughnane's book Shakespeare at Thirty is published this week by Princeton University Press, and his exhibition The Making of Marlowe runs until 22 November at the Beaney House of Art & Knowledge in Canterbury.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The finding adds a previously anonymous play to both the Shakespeare and Marlowe canons, changing what scholars know about each author's body of work.
  • It recasts the most famous relationship in English drama: instead of mere rivals, Shakespeare and Marlowe appear to have been working collaborators in their twenties.
  • It demonstrates the growing role of computerised textual analysis in settling long-running attribution debates.

Background

Edward III is an Elizabethan history play, published anonymously in 1596, that never appeared in the 1623 First Folio. For centuries scholars argued over whether Shakespeare had any hand in it, with the case previously resting on a handful of likely scenes. Earlier scholarship had already suggested Marlowe's presence in Shakespeare's Henry VI plays; the new study extends that link and dates the Shakespeare-Marlowe collaboration to the early 1590s, before Marlowe's death in 1593.

Key Perspectives

Dr Rory Loughnane (co-author): Argues the case is now proven "beyond any reasonable doubt" and that Edward III is a newly found collaboration with major implications for the Shakespeare and Marlowe canons.

Brett Greatley-Hirsch (co-author): Emphasises that the evidence is compelling because multiple independent forms of analysis converge on the same attribution, rather than resting on a single verbal parallel.

The researchers' own caveat: The analysis works at the level of segments and marker-word distributions, and the authors note that Shakespeare segments "may overlap with bits of writing he did not do," so line-by-line authorship remains a matter of statistical inference.

What to Watch

  • Publication of the full findings in the Shakespeare Quarterly later this year, which will open the study to formal scholarly scrutiny.
  • Reception of Loughnane's book Shakespeare at Thirty, released this week by Princeton University Press.
  • The Making of Marlowe exhibition at the Beaney House of Art & Knowledge in Canterbury, which runs until 22 November and may engage with the new claims.

Sources

Checked

11 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedShakespeare confirmed as main author of Edward III, study finds Marlowe collaborationUK news | The Guardian: “Scholars conclude ‘beyond doubt’ that Shakespeare was main author of Edward III. Dramatic new evidence concludes that the play Edward III should be added to William Shakespeare’s canon, and also that it was a major collaboration with his contemporary rival Christopher Marlowe.”
  2. SupportedComputerised analysis finds the 1596 play was written with Christopher MarloweUK news | The Guardian: “computerised textual analysis pushed the case 'beyond any reasonable doubt' that the Stratford-born playwright was the principal writer. ... it was a major collaboration with his contemporary rival Christopher Marlowe”
  3. SupportedNew computerised linguistic research has concluded beyond any reasonable doubt that William Shakespeare was the principal author of the anonymous 1596 history play Edward III, and that it was written in collaboration with Christopher Marlowe, a claim made seriously for the first time.UK news | The Guardian: “pushed the case 'beyond any reasonable doubt' that the Stratford-born playwright was the principal writer. ... 'That’s the new finding, that both Shakespeare, now confirmed beyond doubt, and Marlowe, unexpectedly found for the first time, are present in the play, and therefore it represents a newly found collaboration between the two.' ... 'This is the first time this case has been made seriously.'”
  4. SupportedThe finding, described by researchers as having massive implications for both playwrights' canons, will be published in the Shakespeare Quarterly later this year.UK news | The Guardian: “Loughnane said: 'It has massive implications for our understanding of the relationship between the two most important dramatists of this period. This changes both the Shakespeare canon and the Marlowe canon and will be of significant international interest.' ... The research will be published in the Shakespeare Quarterly later this year.”
  5. SupportedDr Rory Loughnane, a reader in early modern studies at the University of Kent and general editor of the Oxford Marlowe editorial project, said the new analysis pushed the case beyond any reasonable doubt.UK news | The Guardian: “Loughnane, a reader in early modern studies at the University of Kent and general editor of the Oxford Marlowe editorial project, told the Guardian that computerised textual analysis pushed the case 'beyond any reasonable doubt'”
  6. Supported"That's the new finding, that both Shakespeare, now confirmed beyond doubt, and Marlowe, unexpectedly found for the first time, are present in the play, and therefore it represents a newly found collaboration between the two," he said.UK news | The Guardian: “That’s the new finding, that both Shakespeare, now confirmed beyond doubt, and Marlowe, unexpectedly found for the first time, are present in the play, and therefore it represents a newly found collaboration between the two.”
  7. SupportedLoughnane said the discovery had 'massive implications for our understanding of the relationship between the two most important dramatists of this period. This changes both the Shakespeare canon and the Marlowe canon and will be of significant international interest.'UK news | The Guardian: “It has massive implications for our understanding of the relationship between the two most important dramatists of this period. This changes both the Shakespeare canon and the Marlowe canon and will be of significant international interest.”
  8. SupportedIn one test, 23 segments, described as 'the lion's share,' were identified as written by Shakespeare and nine segments as written by Marlowe, whose works include Doctor Faustus.UK news | The Guardian: “In one test, 23 segments – 'the lion's share' – were identified as being written by Shakespeare, while nine segments were classified as Marlowe, whose works include Doctor Faustus.”
  9. SupportedThe analysis identifies a speech at the start of scene 13, in which a sudden darkening of the sky alarms the French camp and King Jean says 'A sudden darkness hath defaced the sky,' as Shakespeare's.UK news | The Guardian: “The analysis confirms that a speech from the beginning of scene 13 was written by Shakespeare, when a sudden and ominous darkening of the sky causes fear in the French camp, and King Jean says: 'A sudden darkness hath defaced the sky …'”
  10. SupportedA speech from the play's final scene, beginning 'Great servitor to bloody Mars in arms, / The Frenchman's terror and his country's fame,' is attributed to Marlowe.UK news | The Guardian: “The analysis concludes that a speech from the final scene of the play was written by Marlowe: 'Great servitor to bloody Mars in arms, / The Frenchman’s terror and his country’s fame.'”
  11. SupportedLoughnane acknowledged a caveat: Shakespeare's authorship of some segments 'may overlap with bits of writing he did not do.'UK news | The Guardian: “They also suggest Shakespeare’s authorship of segments, 'which may overlap with bits of writing he did not do'”

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe