Strong language models often fail to recognize their own errors

Across 15 benchmarks, confidence reports poorly identified some errors, particularly on difficult questions and mistakes shared with another model.

Independent
Dongqi Han · Yifan Yang · Dongsheng Li
Research Digest··2 min read
Han and colleagues tested whether four frontier language models could distinguish their correct answers from their mistakes.

The authors evaluated four frontier models across 15 benchmarks, comparing task performance with models’ reported confidence.

Why this paper

Independent

In one line

LLMs' confidence reports poorly discriminate errors from correct answers on hard problems, even with self-review.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ·No benchmark numbers found

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.