Supermarket coffee brands quietly drop '100 per cent arabica' labels as bean prices soar

Consumers may not notice as premium coffee is relabelled 'coffee' or described as a blend with more bitter robusta beans.

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Major supermarket coffee brands have quietly changed their marketing in response to bean prices surging to almost 50-year highs, with some products that were previously labelled '100 per cent arabica' now simply described as 'coffee' or as a blend that includes robusta, a more bitter variety.

The change, while legal, has drawn criticism from experts and consumers who say shoppers deserve clear information when a product's formulation changes.

Cairns pensioner Brian Rantzau, whose preferred Coles Organic Fairtrade Gold Freeze Dried Coffee has doubled in price since early 2024 from $4 per 100 grams to $8, said he wanted clear labelling. Earlier this year, the product's '100 per cent arabica' description was changed to read simply 'instant coffee'. Both the old and new labels may appear on shelves as stores phase out the old recipe.

"As a pensioner, you've got to mind every dollar," Mr Rantzau said. "It should really tell us what's in it, right?"

Gold Coast mother Vicki Jarvis said she stopped buying the product because of the price rise and the label change. "If they've gone and changed what is actually in it, it should be written on the front of the label to let people know," she said.

A spokesperson for Coles said from time to time, product formulations may need to change in response to ingredient availability and supply conditions. "We work closely with our suppliers to ensure our products continue to meet our quality standards and provide great value for customers," the spokesperson said.

Australian food labelling rules do not require coffee companies to identify the species of bean unless they make a specific claim about it. University of Queensland sensory scientist Heather Smyth said consumers had every right to feel ripped off.

"Consumers should feel ripped off if something very small has changed in a product and the makers of that product are not declaring what that change is," Professor Smyth said.

Prof Smyth noted that robusta is not a bad bean, but it is more bitter than arabica.

Specialty coffee roaster Jason Lilienstein, who runs a business focused on high-quality beans, said the shift could mislead customers who had chosen a product specifically for its arabica content.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Supermarket coffee shoppers may unknowingly be buying a different product with a more bitter taste, without clear front-of-pack communication.
  • The price of some products has doubled, and relabelling without explanation could erode trust in grocery brands.
  • The practice highlights gaps in Australian food labelling laws, which only require bean species identification when a specific claim is made.

Background

Coffee bean prices have surged to almost 50-year highs, driven by supply constraints and increased demand. Arabica beans, prized for their sweeter and more complex flavour, are more expensive than robusta, which is hardier but more bitter. Major supermarket brands are responding by reformulating products or changing labelling to reduce costs, while still selling at similar price points.

Key Perspectives

Consumers: Expect clear labelling and feel misled when a product's key ingredient description changes without prominent notice. Many are sensitive to both price and quality. Supermarket and suppliers (Coles): Product formulations may need to change due to ingredient availability and supply conditions. They assert that quality standards and value are maintained. **Experts and food scientists: The practice is legal but ethically questionable. They argue that when a defining ingredient such as arabica is removed or reduced, the change should be declared so consumers can make informed choices.

What to Watch

  • Whether other major supermarket brands follow similar relabelling practices on coffee or other products.
  • Consumer advocacy group or regulator responses to the labelling loophole.
  • Whether arabica or robusta prices ease, reducing the incentive for such changes.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.