Sydney Airport near-collision among most severe in 20 years, investigators say

ATSB flags fatigue risk for controllers in preliminary reports on six incidents

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
A near-collision between two aircraft at Sydney Airport in July was one of the most severe runway conflicts since record-keeping began more than 20 years ago, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau has found, with fatigue flagged as a risk factor for air traffic controllers.

The ATSB on Wednesday released four preliminary reports covering six incidents at Kingsford Smith Airport between July and August. The reports do not make findings or recommendations but outline the sequence of events.

On July 27, a "breakdown of coordination" led an air traffic controller to clear a Boeing 737 carrying 157 people to cross a runway as a QantasLink Bombardier carrying 55 people was landing. The controller had a "high predicted fatigue risk level" when a brief handover was given to another controller during a break.

ATSB Commissioner Angus Mitchell said the July 27 incident was a "Category A runway incursion", the most severe classification, and only the third such event in Australia since records began in 2003.

"[The 737] had stopped before reaching the intersection of runway 34L and runway 25 but was within the runway surface area past the runway stop bars, resulting in a runway incursion," the report said. "[The Bombardier] came to a stop prior to the runway 34L and 25 runway intersection. When both aircraft came to a stop, they were approximately 120 m apart."

The report said Sydney's air traffic control tower was operating with high predicted fatigue levels for four out of seven controllers at the time.

"Whilst an elevated fatigue risk does not necessarily mean a controller was fatigued, or that fatigue affected performance, we are, however, examining the effectiveness of the measures that were in place to manage this pre-identified risk," Mr Mitchell said.

"In all six incidents, safety defences operated in some form; air traffic controllers, pilots or ground crew acted to prevent more serious outcomes," he said.

Airservices Australia roster modelling had predicted an "elevated fatigue risk" for staff on many of the shifts in question, the report said.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The July 27 event brought two aircraft with a combined 212 people on board to within about 120 m of each other on a runway.
  • It is only the third Category A runway incursion in Australia since 2003, marking a rare and serious breakdown of runway coordination.
  • The examination of fatigue risk among air traffic controllers could lead to changes in rostering practices across the industry.

Background

The ATSB is Australia's independent transport safety investigator. It investigates accidents and serious incidents to improve safety rather than to assign blame. Airservices Australia, a government-owned corporation, provides air traffic control services, including at Sydney Airport. A Category A runway incursion is the most serious classification used by regulators and indicates a situation in which a collision was narrowly avoided.

Key Perspectives

ATSB: The bureau's preliminary reports describe the incidents without findings or recommendations. Commissioner Mitchell said the investigation is examining whether measures to manage pre-identified fatigue risks were effective, while cautioning that elevated fatigue risk does not necessarily mean a controller was fatigued.

Airservices Australia: The reports indicate roster modelling by the air traffic services provider had predicted an elevated fatigue risk for staff on many of the relevant shifts, and the measures in place to manage that risk are now under scrutiny.

Air traffic controllers: The fatigue risk is described as pre-identified and rostering-related. Four of seven controllers on duty at the time of the July incident were assessed as having a "high predicted fatigue risk level".

What to Watch

  • Whether the final ATSB investigation reports identify contributing factors and issue safety recommendations.
  • Whether Airservices Australia revises its rostering or fatigue management measures in response to the preliminary findings.
  • Any further runway incidents at Sydney Airport, which would indicate whether the fatigue and coordination issues have been resolved.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.