Tasmanian Government Confirms Dozens of Job Cuts as Restructure Looms, Union Says

Workers face uncertainty as positions identified for abolition across Building Tasmania and other agencies, despite premier's no-forced-redundancy pledge

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time4 min
At least 80 roles are set to be eliminated across several Tasmanian government agencies, including Building Tasmania, as part of a broader public service restructure, according to the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) and multiple sources. Despite the premier's weekend commitment that no worker would be forced out, an all-staff meeting on Monday revealed that specific positions had been identified for abolition, leaving employees confused and anxious about their futures.

The Tasmanian government's plan to shrink the state service moved a step closer on Monday when public service workers were told at an all-staff meeting that a number of jobs from each area had been identified to be abolished. The announcement follows the May budget, which targeted 250 job cuts at Building Tasmania (formerly the Department of State Growth), primarily through voluntary redundancies.

Over the weekend, Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirmed that 111 full-time workers had already taken redundancies and reiterated his commitment that none would be forced. However, at Monday's meeting, staff were shown a slide presentation outlining operational efficiencies and redundancy numbers, although the specific number of planned cuts for each area was only communicated verbally.

The CPSU and multiple sources have told the ABC that the number of positions to be abolished is understood to be roughly:

  • Building Tasmania — 32
  • Creative Industries, Sport and Visitor Economy — 23
  • Department of Premier and Cabinet — 5
  • Workers moving from Building Tasmania — 27
  • Corporate Services — 23

The ABC has asked the government to confirm the exact figures. Staff who spoke to the ABC left the meeting confused and still unclear about how many jobs would go or how the process would work. It is understood that workers will be informed over the next few days which positions are being targeted, with the full restructure expected to be revealed on Wednesday afternoon.

CPSU secretary Thirza White criticised the way the information was delivered, saying the meeting was meant to provide certainty but instead created more confusion. "There was quite significant frustration at that meeting today that despite being promised information and delaying the deadline for that information three times that that information was only provided verbally," she said.

"This is a really stressful time. People need to be given the information in a written format so they can go away and consider it. Now, instead over the next two to three days, people will be tapped on the shoulder and told they are potentially now an identified employee. It's not the way we should be doing this and it makes a stressful situation even more stressful."

Ms White said her union's own calculations suggested the cuts would be significant. "We have done some back of the envelope calculations and at a minimum we're looking at 80 roles being cut and likely north of a hundred roles," she said. "These are huge cuts and agency leadership today did acknowledge that it's up to 10 per cent of the workforce in DPAC and Building Tasmania that will be directly impacted."

The slide show, seen by the ABC, addresses some of the workforce's questions. Under the heading "When will I know if I have a job in the new structure?" it says workers are "keen to have certainty" about future positions and that "we expect many of you will know by mid-late October whether you have a confirmed position in the new organisational structure." It also notes that just because a position does not appear in the proposed structure, it does not automatically mean that role is being removed.

Ms White challenged Premier Rockliff to keep his commitment of no forced redundancies, noting his public statements over the weekend. The government has not yet responded to requests for confirmation of the exact numbers.

§

Analysis

Why this matters

  • The restructure will directly affect the livelihoods of at least 80 public servants, with the potential for more than 100 job losses, creating significant personal and financial uncertainty for workers and their families.
  • The communication breakdown between the government and its workforce could erode trust in the public service and complicate future staffing reforms.
  • The outcome may set a precedent for how the Tasmanian government manages public sector downsizing, with potential ripple effects for service delivery and union-government relations.

Background

The Tasmanian government announced in its May budget a plan to cut 250 jobs from Building Tasmania, which was formerly the Department of State Growth. The government has repeatedly stated that voluntary redundancies would be the primary method, with no compulsory retrenchments. The public service as a whole is under pressure to reduce spending, and the restructure is part of a broader effort to streamline state services. The union has been vocal in its criticism of the lack of transparency and the reliance on verbal communication during the process.

Key perspectives

  • Tasmanian Government (Premier Jeremy Rockliff): Committed to reducing the state service's size and has argued that voluntary redundancies will avoid forced job losses. Seeks to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
  • CPSU (Thirza White): Represents workers directly affected. Argues that the communication has been inadequate, and the scale of cuts is significant. Calls for written information and a transparent process to reduce anxiety.
  • Workers/Affected Employees: Left confused and uncertain about their job security; eager for clarity on the selection process and timeline for the restructure, especially given the promise of no forced redundancies.

What to watch

  • The full restructure details, expected to be announced on Wednesday afternoon, which should clarify the exact number of roles cut and the selection criteria.
  • Whether the government maintains its commitment to no forced redundancies or whether pressure to meet budget targets leads to a change in that public position.
  • Union responses and potential industrial action if workers feel the process is unfair or if the number of forced redundancies rises.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.