Tokenized stock trading surges overseas as Goldman Sachs, Microsoft object to US platform

Trading volumes on Robinhood Chain soared from $526m to $11.3bn in three months, but a growing list of major US companies are pushing back against tokenization on the OKXICE venue

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Sources2 outlets
Trading in tokenized stocks is booming in international markets, with volumes on Robinhood Chain rocketing from $526m in July to $11.31bn in September, even as a growing number of major US companies including Goldman Sachs, Microsoft and McDonald's object to having their shares tokenised on the OKXICE platform, a joint venture between crypto exchange OKX and Intercontinental Exchange.

Blockchain-based representations of traditional equities, known as tokenized stocks, are gaining significant traction overseas, according to Bitwise Asset Management's latest quarterly staking report published Tuesday. On Robinhood Chain, the brokerage's newly launched network for users and AI agents to trade assets onchain, tokenized stock volumes surged dramatically over the quarter. Non-crypto markets also made up 36.5% of Hyperliquid's perpetuals volume, up from 32.7% in the previous quarter, while tokenized equities were the fastest-growing category on Solana.

The surge comes as the debate over the rights and risks of tokenization intensifies. On Monday, OKXICE disclosed in a public notice that Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Qualcomm, Caterpillar, McDonald's, Western Digital and Alphabet had objected to having tokenized versions of their shares traded on the platform. They join earlier objectors including CoreWeave, UnitedHealth, Broadcom, Applied Digital, AppLovin and Cerebras, bringing the total to 16 companies.

Andrew Cuomo, co-chairman of OKXICE, framed the objections as an expected part of the process. "This is a very natural response. The model was designed to give companies the right to determine whether they want to opt in or opt out. We always anticipated that, because this is such a dramatic and revolutionary change, many companies would want to wait and see how it goes rather than be the first to participate," he said in a statement. Cuomo added that the SEC's innovation exemption, introduced last month, creates a temporary pathway for tokenized stocks in the US and requires that companies be able to object.

Mirza Uddin, chief operating officer of Injective, noted the difference between offshore activity and the US framework. "The divergence comes down to what's actually being traded. Offshore, most of this activity is price exposure through onchain perps and wrapped tokens that never needed a company's permission, while the U.S. framework is trying to put real shares onchain, and that gives issuers a say," he said. "Right now companies like Goldman and Microsoft see all of the risk and none of the upside – a token they don't control trading 24/7 with unclear voting rights."

ClearStreet analyst Owen Lau suggested some companies may eventually embrace tokenization. "Some companies will say yes or will not object to this because of the benefits … the expanded investor base, 24/7 [access], increased distribution channel. Some of the beaten down stocks with low trading volume could be good candidates," he said. Lau also pointed to benefits such as greater visibility, direct dividend payments and cost savings, and noted that tokenized assets can act as collateral for decentralized finance platforms.

The issue of what rights token holders should receive, particularly voting rights, first came into focus in September after a public dispute between the CEOs of Robinhood and AMC over Robinhood's stock-token model. As of Wednesday, 16 companies have objected to OKXICE's tokenization, though that does not necessarily mean they oppose all tokenization models. The SEC's exemption limits the number of participating companies and trading volume.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Tokenized stocks could reshape how equities are traded, offering 24/7 markets and expanded global access, but the pushback from major issuers signals deep skepticism about control and shareholder rights.
  • The growth is happening offshore, meaning US investors may be locked out unless the regulatory framework and issuer attitudes shift.
  • The debate over voting rights and economic equivalence will determine whether tokenization becomes a mainstream complement to traditional stock markets or remains a niche crypto product.

Background

Tokenization involves issuing digital representations of securities on a blockchain, promising increased liquidity, lower costs and broader distribution. The SEC's innovation exemption last month created a temporary US pathway that requires companies to opt in or out. OKXICE, the joint venture from OKX and NYSE parent ICE, launched to offer tokenized equities under this framework. The concept has gained traction in offshore markets, where such restrictions do not apply, but the reaction from major US companies highlights the tension between issuer control and the open nature of blockchain trading.

Key Perspectives

Issuers (objecting companies): Companies like Goldman Sachs, Microsoft and McDonald's see tokenization as a risk they do not control, with unclear implications for voting rights, dividend distribution and 24/7 trading that could affect their share price and governance. They have the right to opt out under the current SEC exemption.

Crypto industry proponents: Figures like Andrew Cuomo and Mirza Uddin argue the objections are a natural caution that will fade as benefits become clearer. They point to the explosive growth offshore as evidence of investor demand and note that the model is designed to accommodate both opt-in and opt-out approaches.

Analysts: Owen Lau expects some companies to eventually embrace tokenization for the expanded investor base, cost savings and 24/7 trading, particularly those with low trading volumes. The challenge is for the industry to better articulate the upside to issuers.

What to Watch

  • Whether any major US company opts in to tokenization on OKXICE or another platform, which would signal a shift in sentiment.
  • The SEC's next steps on tokenized equities, including whether the innovation exemption becomes permanent or expires.
  • Offshore growth metrics: continued volume increases could pressure US companies to reconsider their objections.
  • The resolution of voting rights and shareholder treatment in tokenized models, especially after the AMC-Robinhood dispute.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 7 supported.

Show each claim
  1. Partly supportedThe headline describes OKXICE as a US platform.US Top News and Analysis: “the OKXICE platform, the tokenized securities venue jointly launched the crypto exchange OKX and New York Stock Exchange parent Intercontinental Exchange.”
  2. SupportedTrading volumes on Robinhood Chain rose from $526 million in July to $11.31 billion in September.US Top News and Analysis: “tokenized stocks volume surged from $526 million in July to $2.21 billion in August, then rocketed to $11.31 billion in September.”
  3. Not in the sourcesOKXICE is a joint venture between OKX and Intercontinental Exchange.US Top News and Analysis: “the OKXICE platform, the tokenized securities venue jointly launched the crypto exchange OKX and New York Stock Exchange parent Intercontinental Exchange.”
  4. SupportedGoldman Sachs, Microsoft and other companies objected to tokenized versions of their shares being traded on OKXICE.US Top News and Analysis: “Goldman Sachs , Microsoft , Qualcomm , Caterpillar , McDonald's , Western Digital and Alphabet have objected to having tokenized versions of their shares traded on the OKXICE platform”
  5. SupportedSixteen companies had objected to having tokenized shares traded on OKXICE as of Wednesday.US Top News and Analysis: “As of Wednesday, 16 companies have objected to having tokenized versions of their shares traded on OKXICE.”
  6. SupportedAndrew Cuomo said, “This is a very natural response. The model was designed to give companies the right to determine whether they want to opt in or opt out.”US Top News and Analysis: “"This is a very natural response. The model was designed to give companies the right to determine whether they want to opt in or opt out.”
  7. Partly supportedThe story attributes to Cuomo the claim that the SEC exemption creates a temporary pathway and requires companies to be able to object.US Top News and Analysis: “after the SEC last month put out an innovation exemption creating a temporary pathway for tokenized stocks in the U.S. – which requires that companies be able to object”
  8. Partly supportedThe SEC exemption limits the number of participating companies and trading volume.US Top News and Analysis: “"There are limits on how many companies can participate and on the volume that can be traded ..."”
  9. SupportedMirza Uddin said offshore activity is mostly price exposure through onchain perps and wrapped tokens, while the US framework puts real shares onchain and gives issuers a say.US Top News and Analysis: “"The divergence comes down to what's actually being traded. Offshore, most of this activity is price exposure through onchain perps and wrapped tokens that never needed a company's permission, while the U.S. framework is trying to put real shares onchain, and that gives issuers a say," said Mirza Uddin”
  10. SupportedOwen Lau said some companies may accept tokenization for benefits including a wider investor base and 24/7 access.US Top News and Analysis: “"Some companies will say yes or will not object to this because of the benefits … the expanded investor base, 24/7 [access], increased distribution channel.”
  11. Partly supportedLau pointed to tokenized assets acting as collateral for decentralized finance platforms.US Top News and Analysis: “For investors, tokenized assets can also act as collateral for decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, offering them more flexibility and control.”
  12. SupportedThe issue of token-holder rights, particularly voting rights, first came into focus in September after a public dispute between the Robinhood and AMC CEOs.US Top News and Analysis: “The issue first came into focus in September after a public fight between the CEOs of Robinhood and AMC over Robinhood's stock-token model.”

Zotpaper

Written by June Katz on the Tech & AI desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub. Plate by Ollie Flash, picture desk.

1 source7 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe