Wednesday 7 October 2026
Evening EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Business

Treasury Committee launches inquiry into Bank of England independence

MPs to examine whether the central bank's rate-setting powers should be more accountable to government

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
The Treasury Committee has opened an inquiry into the relationship between the Bank of England and the government, questioning whether the central bank's independence in setting interest rates should be changed. The move comes as rates remain at 3.75% with predictions of further rises, putting pressure on mortgage holders, jobseekers, and the wider economy.

The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) sets interest rates eight times a year, but its nine members are unelected and operate independently of government. Until May 2022, rates had not climbed above 1% for 13 years, but they now stand at 3.75% and are forecast to rise again. The Treasury Committee, a powerful cross-party group of MPs, has launched an inquiry into this arrangement, examining whether the central bank's independence remains appropriate.

The inquiry follows growing public attention on rate decisions, as higher borrowing costs affect mortgage repayments and unemployment. Three progressive economists – Costas Lapavitsas, James Meadway, and Ann Pettifor – have set out a case for change, arguing for greater democratic oversight of monetary policy.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Interest rate decisions directly affect mortgage holders, renters, and jobseekers across the UK.
  • The inquiry could lead to changes in how the Bank of England operates, potentially giving government more influence over rates.
  • The outcome may set a precedent for central bank independence in other countries.

Background

The Bank of England was granted operational independence to set interest rates in 1997, a move designed to depoliticise monetary policy and control inflation. Since then, the MPC has set rates without government approval. However, the post-pandemic inflation surge and subsequent rate rises have brought new scrutiny to this arrangement, with critics questioning the accountability of unelected officials making decisions with vast economic consequences.

Key Perspectives

Supporters of independence: Argue that keeping politics out of rate-setting ensures credibility and prevents short-term political cycles from driving inflation. They fear any change could undermine market confidence. Critics of independence: Contend that decisions affecting millions should be subject to democratic oversight. They argue that the current system has prioritised inflation control over employment and growth, and that the Treasury should have a say. The Treasury Committee: Its inquiry is not a statement of intent but a fact-finding exercise. The committee will hear evidence and produce recommendations, which the government may or may not adopt.

What to Watch

  • The Treasury Committee's hearing schedule and witness list.
  • Any indication from the chancellor or prime minister about openness to reform.
  • Market reaction to any proposals that suggest reduced Bank independence.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe