Tribal villagers allege fake thumb impressions behind Adani bauxite mine in Odisha

Consent documents claim all 580 adults agreed to give up sacred forest land; village heads call meetings invalid

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Villagers in Odisha's Koraput district have alleged that their thumb impressions and signatures were forged on documents consenting to a $24m bauxite mine developed by an Adani subsidiary on forest land considered sacred by local Indigenous communities.

Shopkeeper Raghunath Khara said he was shocked to see his thumb impression on a paper declaring he had consented to the government-backed mining proposal. "I always sign in English. It was someone else's thumb," he told Al Jazeera. Khara said he never attended the village council meeting at all, but was protesting with his wife, sister and other villagers about 100 metres from the village office in Balda.

The mine is being developed by Kalinga Alumina Limited, a subsidiary of Adani Enterprises, the conglomerate owned by Gautam Adani, India's second richest businessman and a figure close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The project will consume a large part of Balda Hill, home to forests, grasslands and caves considered sacred by at least 10 surrounding tribal villages.

Purported signatures and thumb impressions of nearly 600 tribal adults were allegedly collected during council meetings in Balda and neighbouring Bannur, 5km away, held on October 9 last year. Indian law recognises the rights of Indigenous communities over traditional lands, and requires a village council resolution for any diversion of such land. A resolution is valid only if 50 percent of all adults consent in writing.

Government documents claim all 580 adults in the two villages agreed to give up their land. But the elected village heads of both villages denied any signatures were collected and called the two meetings invalid. Photographs taken by villagers show combined attendance of about 100 people, far below the required quorum.

Villagers allege most signatures on the resolution documents are fake, forged or impersonated. They say the documents contain names of fictitious persons and people who died years ago, and that some signatures from an earlier, unrelated council meeting were fraudulently pasted onto the bauxite mine document.

Al Jazeera emailed the Adani group for comment; the published report does not include a response.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The mine sits on land that Indian law protects for Indigenous communities, where written consent from a majority of adults is compulsory before land can be diverted.
  • If the signatures were forged, the legal basis for the land diversion could be invalid, raising questions about how the project was approved.
  • The case adds to public scrutiny of Adani's mining operations and of how India enforces tribal land protections in practice.

Background

India's constitution recognises the rights of Indigenous communities over their traditional lands, and forest laws and statutes granting autonomy to tribal areas dictate that village council resolutions are mandatory before such land is used for other purposes. A resolution is valid only if at least half of all adults in the village consent in writing. Adani Enterprises is one of India's largest conglomerates, and its subsidiary Kalinga Alumina Limited is developing the bauxite project on Balda Hill in Koraput district, a tribal-dominated region of Odisha state.

Key Perspectives

Villagers and tribal communities: say they were protesting the mine rather than attending the meetings, and allege that signatures were forged, impersonated or recycled from unrelated documents. Government documents: claim all 580 adults in Balda and Bannur consented in writing to the project. Elected village heads: denied that any signatures were collected and declared both meetings invalid. Kalinga Alumina Limited and the Adani group: were contacted for comment by Al Jazeera, but no response appears in the published report.

What to Watch

  • Any public response from the Adani group to the forgery allegations.
  • Whether authorities audit the consent documents or investigate the two village council meetings.
  • Progress of the mine and whether affected families receive compensation or any restoration of land.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe