Trump administration AI pilot for Medicare prior authorization faces backlash over delays, denials, and legality concerns

Documents released by the Electronic Frontier Foundation show provider frustration and patient suffering; GAO says program was improperly established

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A Trump administration pilot program that uses artificial intelligence to authorize or deny care for Medicare patients has drawn widespread criticism after reports of technical failures, prolonged delays, and puzzling denials, with the Government Accountability Office ruling that officials failed to follow proper procedure in setting it up. Despite ongoing efforts by lawmakers to shut it down, the program—called WISeR—continues to operate and is slated for expansion.

Launched in January, the WISeR program represents a major shift for Medicare, which previously did not require doctors to obtain prior authorization for certain types of care. Under the pilot, an AI system makes coverage decisions for seniors enrolled in the federal healthcare program.

Media reports have documented technical difficulties, long delays in decisions and care, puzzling denials, frustrated doctors, and patients suffering in pain while awaiting approvals. Earlier this month, the Electronic Frontier Foundation released federal documents obtained through litigation that included feedback from healthcare providers. One provider called the program "a disgrace to the human race" and reported seeing patients crying in pain as they waited for care.

Lawmakers have been seeking answers and attempting to halt the program. In May, the Government Accountability Office determined that Trump officials did not follow proper procedure in establishing WISeR, raising questions about its legality. Nevertheless, the pilot appears to be moving ahead unabated, with plans to expand in the years to come.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The pilot directly affects seniors' access to medical care, with reports of patients experiencing pain and delayed treatment.
  • It sets a precedent for using AI in government healthcare decisions, potentially expanding to other programs.
  • Legal questions over the program's establishment could lead to broader scrutiny of executive branch rulemaking.

Background

Medicare is the federal health insurance program for people aged 65 and older, as well as certain younger individuals with disabilities. Prior authorization—requiring approval before certain treatments or procedures—has traditionally been used by private insurers but not for Medicare patients. The WISeR program marks the first use of AI to automate these decisions for seniors, a significant policy shift undertaken without direct congressional approval.

Key Perspectives

Patients and advocates: Seniors and their families face unexpected denials and long waits for care, leading to physical and emotional distress. Advocacy groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation argue the program is opaque and harmful. Healthcare providers: Doctors have reported frustration with the system, describing it as unworkable and harmful to patients. Some have called for the program to be discontinued. Trump administration and CMS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has defended the pilot as a modernization effort aimed at reducing waste and improving efficiency. It has continued to move forward despite legal setbacks. Critics/Skeptics: The GAO ruling that proper procedures were not followed suggests the program may be legally vulnerable. Lawmakers from both parties have expressed concerns, and some Democrats have forced votes to end the pilot.

What to Watch

  • Congressional action: Whether lawmakers succeed in defunding or repealing the program.
  • Legal challenges: The EFF litigation and any future lawsuits could force changes or halt WISeR.
  • Program expansion: CMS plans to scale up the pilot, and any expansion could intensify backlash.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.