Trump announces 'AI Force' and AI czar, dismisses safety warnings as 'hoax' amid industry push for regulation

President compares initiative to Space Force, says US must lead China; White House and industry reportedly caught off guard

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources11 outlets
President Donald Trump announced plans on Saturday to create an "AI Force" modeled after the Space Force and appoint an "AI czar" with a "high IQ," while dismissing growing calls for AI safety regulations as a "hoax" and vowing not to "stifle the growth" of the industry. The announcement comes as a wave of warnings from AI researchers—including a departing Anthropic employee who said there is a greater than 10% chance AI could kill all humans by 2030—has spurred executives at major labs to urge Washington to slow development.

In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform on September 19, Trump said his new unit would "cherish, help, and watch over" AI as it grows, rejecting any new regulations that could hinder innovation. He argued that AI "is the next Industrial Revolution, or Internet, but will be even larger and more impactful, possibly as much as 25% of our Country's GDP." The president also expressed his desire for the U.S. to maintain its lead over China in AI, which is expected to be discussed when he meets President Xi Jinping next week.

Trump offered no details on the initiative's implementation or timeline. According to reports, the announcement took both the White House and the tech industry by surprise. He did, however, state that his administration would use the existing criminal and civil justice system to target any "bad actors" using AI.

The president also repeated his view that concerns about AI's potential dangers are a "hoax," part of what he called a "sick conspiracy" to undermine the technology. This stance puts him directly at odds with a growing chorus of safety advocates.

Just days before the announcement, an ex-OpenAI researcher who resigned from Anthropic warned that AI companies were "gambling with human lives," stating that the builders of AI "earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade." Another Anthropic safety researcher estimated a more than 10% chance of AI causing human extinction by 2030. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei—backed by executives at OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Microsoft—published an essay urging Washington to slow AI development over fears that autonomous agents could spiral out of control.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has taken a similar position to Trump, dismissing the doomsday warnings as unfounded and saying there is a "0% chance" AI will destroy the world by 2030. "We should go as fast as we can, irrespective of anyone else," Huang said, rejecting calls for new regulations.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Trump's plan signals a sharp departure from the cautious approach many lawmakers and industry leaders have called for, potentially accelerating AI development without regulatory guardrails.
  • The U.S. competitive position against China in AI is at stake, with Trump set to discuss the issue with President Xi next week.
  • The announcement could widen the rift between AI accelerationists (who argue for minimal oversight) and safety advocates (who warn of existential risk).

Background

Trump's proposal to create an "AI Force" echoes his establishment of the U.S. Space Force during his first term. The initiative would apparently be a new federal structure to oversee AI development, though no specifics have been provided. The debate over AI safety has intensified in recent weeks, with researchers at leading labs like Anthropic and OpenAI publicly clashing over whether the technology poses an existential threat. Some industry figures, including Nvidia's Jensen Huang, have dismissed these concerns as speculative, while others—including the CEO of Anthropic—have called for a deliberate slowdown to assess risks.

Key Perspectives

Trump administration: Argues that AI is too important for the economy and national security to be slowed by regulation. Views safety warnings as politically motivated attacks. AI safety advocates (ex-Anthropic researchers, Amodei): Warn that unchecked development could lead to catastrophic outcomes, including loss of human control over AI systems. Urge temporary pauses and external governance. Nvidia and accelerationists: Side with Trump, arguing that the U.S. must race ahead regardless of speculative fears to maintain dominance over China.

What to Watch

  • Whether Trump names a specific individual as AI czar and what authority that person will have.
  • The outcome of Trump's meeting with Xi Jinping on AI competition.
  • Any legislative response in Congress, where bipartisan AI bills have stalled.
  • Further resignations or whistleblower actions at AI labs as the safety debate intensifies.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.