Ukraine has broken Russia's offensive ability, sacked general tells BBC

Oleksandr Syrskyi defends his record in first interview since his dismissal this summer

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Ukraine's former commander-in-chief has said Kyiv has stabilised the front line and "broken Russia's ability to advance" by inflicting heavy losses on its invading forces, in his first interview since being dismissed this summer.

Gen Oleksandr Syrskyi made the comments in an interview with the BBC, his first since he was forced from his post in the summer after a public disagreement with the defence minister.

Syrskyi rejected critics who described him as too "old school" to command Ukraine's technologically advanced forces. He also pushed back against allegations from soldiers who served under him, who told the BBC they had been ordered to remain at their positions even when almost surrounded by Russian forces, leading to high losses.

He claimed Moscow's overall losses in the war are six times higher than Ukraine's. "If you count only dead, then it's up to 11 times," he said. Neither Russia nor Ukraine officially releases casualty figures. Ukraine's military says it inflicted record losses on Russian soldiers in September, a claim that cannot be independently verified.

The BBC cited UK intelligence estimates that Russia has lost around half a million men killed since launching its full-scale invasion in 2022. The US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates Ukraine has lost up to 150,000 troops killed by June 2026. Those figures point to a considerably narrower ratio than the one Syrskyi described, although the estimates cover different periods and definitions.

Syrskyi attributed the battlefield situation to the difference in death tolls, Ukraine's technological advances, and a strategy of attacking weak points in Russia's lines while containing its advances elsewhere.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The assessment comes from Ukraine's most senior serving officer until this summer, and directly challenges the narrative that Russia retains the initiative in the war.
  • Syrskyi's defence of his record highlights internal Ukrainian tensions over strategy, troop losses and the human cost of holding the line.
  • The casualty figures he cites, even if disputed, signal the scale of attrition both militaries are absorbing after more than four years of full-scale war.

Background

Syrskyi was removed as commander-in-chief during the summer, with the BBC reporting a public disagreement with the defence minister. He is among the most senior figures to have led Ukraine's military since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. Throughout the war, both sides have treated casualty figures as closely guarded information, making independent verification of battlefield claims difficult and leaving wide scope for competing narratives.

Key Perspectives

Gen Oleksandr Syrskyi: Maintains that Ukraine has stabilised the front line, broken Russia's offensive capacity, and is inflicting losses far heavier than its own. He rejects the charge that his approach is outdated for a technology-driven battlefield. Former subordinates and critics: Soldiers who served under him told the BBC they were ordered to hold positions even when nearly surrounded, and say this contributed to high losses. His dismissal followed a public falling-out with the defence minister. Western intelligence and analysts: UK estimates cited by the BBC suggest around 500,000 Russian soldiers killed since 2022, while the CSIS puts Ukrainian deaths at up to 150,000 by June 2026, a ratio far below the figures Syrskyi cited.

What to Watch

  • Whether Russia can restore offensive capability or is forced into a more defensive posture as reported losses mount.
  • How Ukraine's new military leadership handles hold-or-withdraw decisions on contested sections of the front line.
  • Any official or independently verified casualty figures, which remain the most disputed metric of the war.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe