American importers are a step closer to receiving automatic refunds of $166 billion in tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, after class counsel filed a motion in the U.S. Court of International Trade on Tuesday seeking a relief order that would return the money to more than 330,000 importers of record, regardless of whether they filed individual lawsuits.
The class action, Freestyle World, Inc. v. United States, was certified on Oct. 8 and is being heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade. The motion was filed by class counsel co-leads Lawrence Friedman of Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, and Elizabeth Cabraser and Nicholas Diamand of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein.
“The proposed order would give the agency the authority it says it needs to provide full refunds with interest to all class members, including the tens of thousands of small businesses who lack the resources to bring their own cases,” the co-leads said in a statement provided to Fortune. “We will continue working closely with the Court and the government to make sure all importers who paid these unlawful tariffs receive the refunds they are owed as quickly as possible.”
The Supreme Court ruled in February that the IEEPA tariffs exceeded the president’s powers, opening the door to refunds. As of August, more than $115 billion had been disbursed through Customs and Border Protection’s CAPE system, but thousands of importers, including small businesses and individuals who bought tariffed items online, have not received refunds due to technical errors, lack of legal resources, or missing paperwork.
The Trump administration is contesting the universal refund order, appealing in June on the grounds that Judge Richard Eaton exceeded his authority and that the government cannot give refunds unless importers have sued to recover their money. The Justice Department said in a filing: “CBP has no authority to reliquidate or refund money without a court order.”
Judge Eaton, who presides over all tariff refund cases, has supported universal rebates, ruling in March that all importers who paid IEEPA tariffs were entitled to refunds and issuing a universal refund order in April. He has argued the Supreme Court’s limitations on universal injunctions do not apply to the Court of International Trade because it has exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over trade issues and does not operate like a typical district court.
The Department of Justice has until Nov. 13 to file its answer to the initial complaint and until Dec. 9 to respond to the motion for relief.
Democratic legislators may have more leverage to pressure CBP following midterm victories. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote to CBP in June urging it to speed up refunds. “After the Supreme Court ruled President Trump’s tariffs were illegal, the Administration should have done everything in its power to quickly return that money to the Americans who paid it,” Warren wrote. Democrats have signalled plans to push for legislative repeal of specific levies, beginning with Canada. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), likely to take over as head of the Senate Finance Committee, is leading the charge.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The ruling could return $166 billion to more than 330,000 importers, easing financial pressures on businesses that have raised prices due to tariffs.
- Small businesses and individuals who could not afford to sue may finally receive refunds, potentially lowering consumer prices.
- The case tests limits on universal injunctions after the Supreme Court narrowed them in other contexts, with implications for trade law.
Background
Tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act became a flashpoint in the affordability crisis and contributed to Republican losses in the 2026 midterm elections. The Supreme Court ruled in February 2026 that the tariffs exceeded presidential authority, paving the way for refunds. While over $115 billion has already been returned via CBP's CAPE system, many importers have not received refunds due to administrative issues. The class action seeks automatic repayment for all eligible importers.
Key Perspectives
Class counsel (Lawrence Friedman, Elizabeth Cabraser, Nicholas Diamand): The proposed order gives the agency authority to refund all class members, including small businesses. They will work with the court and government to ensure refunds are paid quickly.
Trump administration (Justice Department): The government cannot give refunds to importers unless they have sued to recover the money; CBP lacks authority to refund without a court order.
Judge Richard Eaton: All importers who paid the tariffs were entitled to refunds; the universal refund order is within the Court of International Trade's exclusive jurisdiction.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.): The administration has slow-walked the refund process and must return money that never belonged to the government.
What to Watch
- The DOJ's response to the motion for relief, due Dec. 9.
- Whether Democratic legislative efforts to repeal tariffs, such as on Canadian goods, gain traction.
- The outcome of the Trump administration's appeal against the universal refund order.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 12 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedUS importers could be one step closer to receiving $166 billion in universal tariff refunds as class counsel seeks relief.Fortune | FORTUNE: “U.S. importers could be one step closer to automatically receiving all of the $166 billion in tariff refunds”
- SupportedA motion filed Tuesday seeks automatic refunds for more than 330,000 importers, whether or not they filed individual lawsuits.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Class counsel in a tariff refund class action against the Trump administration filed a motion in the U.S. Court of International Trade to enter a relief order on Tuesday, which would return money collected from the tariffs to the more than 330,000 importers of record, whether or not they filed an individual lawsuit against the administration.”
- SupportedThe Trump administration argues that only importers who sued should receive refunds.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The Trump administration is fighting for only importers who sued for the refunds to receive them.”
- SupportedClass counsel said the proposed order would authorize full refunds with interest to all class members, including small businesses unable to bring their own cases.Fortune | FORTUNE: ““The proposed order would give the agency the authority it says it needs to provide full refunds with interest to all class members, including the tens of thousands of small businesses who lack the resources to bring their own cases,””
- SupportedClass counsel said they would work with the court and government to secure refunds for importers as quickly as possible.Fortune | FORTUNE: ““We will continue working closely with the Court and the government to make sure all importers who paid these unlawful tariffs receive the refunds they are owed as quickly as possible.””
- SupportedThe Supreme Court ruled in February that IEEPA tariffs exceeded the president’s powers, paving the way for refunds.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The Supreme Court’s February ruling that tariffs imposed under IEEPA exceeded the president’s powers, paved the way for hundreds of billions of dollars in tariff refunds to U.S. importers who footed the bill for the levies.”
- SupportedMore than $115 billion had been disbursed through CBP’s CAPE system as of August, while thousands of importers had yet to receive refunds.Fortune | FORTUNE: “While more than $115 billion have been disbursed back to American companies as of August through Customs and Border Protection’s Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) system, thousands of importers—such as small businesses and individuals who purchased tariffed items online—have yet to receive their money back.”
- SupportedThe administration appealed the universal refund order in June, arguing Judge Eaton exceeded his authority and refunds could not be issued unless importers sued.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The Trump administration, however, has disputed the universal refund order, appealing it in June on the grounds that Eaton exceeded his authority in issuing the universal refund order, and that the government cannot give out refunds to importers unless they have sued to recover the money they lost in tariffs.”
- SupportedThe Justice Department said CBP lacked authority to refund money without a court order.Fortune | FORTUNE: ““CBP has no authority to reliquidate or refund money without a court order,” the Justice Department said in the filing.”
- SupportedJudge Eaton ruled in March that all importers who paid IEEPA tariffs were entitled to refunds and issued a universal refund order the next month.Fortune | FORTUNE: “ruling in March that all importers who paid IEEPA tariffs were entitled to refunds, issuing a universal refund order the next month.”
- SupportedThe Justice Department has until Nov. 13 to answer the initial complaint and until Dec. 9 to respond to the motion for relief.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The Department of Justice, representing the government as the defendant, will have until Nov. 13 to file its answer to the initial complaint and until Dec. 9 respond to the motion for relief.”
- SupportedElizabeth Warren wrote that after the Supreme Court ruling, the administration should have quickly returned the tariff money to the Americans who paid it.Fortune | FORTUNE: ““After the Supreme Court ruled President Trump’s tariffs were illegal, the Administration should have done everything in its power to quickly return that money to the Americans who paid it,” Warren wrote.”