US lobbyists held 350 meetings to dilute EU deforestation law, investigation finds

Mighty Earth report details two-year 'blitz' by American firms and trade associations to postpone and weaken world's most progressive forest protection legislation

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
US corporate lobbyists held more than 350 meetings with European Union officials over two years in an effort to weaken the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), according to a new investigation by the environmental watchdog Mighty Earth. The law, which bans imports of commodities linked to deforestation, has been delayed twice and significantly revised. US industry groups deny a concerted campaign, saying their meetings raised legitimate implementation concerns.

The investigation, published on Thursday, found that 24 major US companies, trade associations and industry organisations discussed the EUDR in at least 173 meetings with members of the European Parliament and 178 meetings with senior European Commission officials between July 2024 and July 2026.

Organisations with the highest number of meetings with the European Commission included the National Alliance of Forest Owners, the Advanced Woody Biomass Alliance, the US Soybean Export Council, Bunge, the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union and Cargill. Cargill had two meetings, Bunge had one, and Mondelēz had eight.

Mighty Earth said lobbying was also conducted through the US Congress, the US Department of Agriculture, the Office of the US Trade Representative and the White House. The report noted that two weeks after a July 2025 meeting between President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the law was further delayed.

The EUDR prohibits imports of cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya and wood from deforested land. When originally put forward in 2003, then European environment commissioner Virginijus Sinkevičius described it as "the most ambitious legislative attempt to tackle these issues worldwide ever". Some US lawmakers had said it should serve as a model for similar rules in the United States.

In the years since, implementation has been postponed twice and the original traceability requirements were revised so extensively that some initial supporters claim the policy has been effectively dismantled. The law is scheduled to come into effect in December.

US company representatives and industry groups deny there was a coordinated campaign to derail the deforestation rules, stating that their engagements with EU officials raised legitimate concerns about implementation.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The EUDR is considered the world's most progressive forest protection legislation; its weakening could increase deforestation linked to global commodity supply chains.
  • The report underscores the scale and persistence of US corporate lobbying efforts to influence European environmental policy.
  • With implementation due in December, further delays or revisions remain possible.

Background

The EU Deforestation Regulation was introduced as a cornerstone of the European Green Deal, aiming to ensure that products sold in the EU do not contribute to deforestation. It requires companies to conduct due diligence on the origin of commodities such as soy, palm oil, cattle and cocoa. The law has faced pushback from trading partners and industry groups since its inception, leading to two delays and significant modifications to its original scope.

Key Perspectives

Mighty Earth: The watchdog argues that US lobbyists mounted a deliberate "blitz" to postpone and weaken the legislation, using meetings with EU officials and pressure via US government channels. US companies and trade associations: They deny a concerted campaign, saying their meetings raised legitimate implementation concerns and that the law's requirements are overly burdensome and impractical. EU officials: The European Commission and Parliament engaged with the lobbyists; the report does not detail their responses, but the resulting delays and revisions suggest the lobbying had an impact.

What to Watch

  • Whether the EUDR takes full effect in December 2026 or faces further postponement.
  • Any new traceability requirements or exemptions introduced before the deadline.
  • Potential US retaliation or trade demands linked to the implementation of the law.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe