US ramps up third-country deportations under Trump despite rights outcry

More than 16,000 people deported to third countries since January 2025, data shows

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
United States immigration authorities have dramatically expanded the use of third-country deportations under President Donald Trump, sending more than 16,000 people to countries where they may have no legal or cultural ties, according to government data and rights groups. Critics say the practice violates international law and risks sending vulnerable asylum seekers to dangerous nations.

Immigration officers with the Department of Homeland Security now make thousands of arrests a day across the country, including people seeking asylum who, under US law and international treaties such as the UN Convention Against Torture, should not be deported to any country where they could face persecution or torture.

To work around these protections, the Trump administration has sought alternative destinations through bilateral agreements or informal understandings with a growing list of countries. The non-profit organisations Refugees International and Human Rights First estimate that more than 25,000 people have been forcibly deported to third countries since January 2025, based on media reports and information from attorneys.

The Department of Homeland Security's own data, provided to the Deportation Data Project at the University of California, Berkeley and UCLA and analysed by Al Jazeera, records more than 16,000 third-country deportations between January 2025 and August 2026, the latest month available. Researchers say the figure is likely an undercount.

Critics of the practice, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the United Nations, say some of the countries receiving deportees have poor human rights records or are so dangerous that the US government warns its own citizens not to travel there. UN experts have described the policy as causing a "cascade of human rights violations" that threatens international norms for refugee protection.

Third-country deportations were extremely rare before the Trump administration, according to rights groups. Some US courts have ruled the practice illegal, but the Supreme Court allowed it to continue in a September 2026 ruling.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Tens of thousands of asylum seekers face deportation to third countries where they may still be unsafe, despite legal protections against refoulement.
  • The policy challenges long-standing international norms around refugee protection and could set a precedent for other nations.
  • US diplomatic relations with receiving countries are affected, and the practice may undermine the credibility of US commitments to human rights.

Background

Third-country deportations have been used sparingly by previous US administrations, typically only with the consent of the deportee. Donald Trump campaigned on a pledge to implement the largest deportation operation in American history, and since taking office in January 2025, his administration has dramatically expanded immigration enforcement. The policy involves sending detainees to nations that have agreed to accept them, even if the deportee has no prior connection to that country. Rights groups argue this circumvents the legal obligation not to return people to danger.

Key Perspectives

Trump administration: Argues the policy is necessary to enforce immigration law and deter illegal entry, and that all deportations are conducted with appropriate legal authority, including through agreements with host countries. Human rights groups (Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Refugees International, Human Rights First): Maintain that the practice violates the principle of non-refoulement, exposes deportees to abuse, and lacks oversight to ensure receiving countries will not simply send them on to their home nations. United Nations experts: Have warned of a “cascade of human rights violations” and called on the US to halt the practice, saying it undermines the global asylum framework.

What to Watch

  • Further US Supreme Court rulings on the legality of third-country deportations.
  • The list of countries entering deportation agreements with the US and the conditions in those nations.
  • International response, including possible UN resolutions or sanctions, and reactions from major allies.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe