Victoria pledges life sentences for rapists in sweeping family violence law reform

Labor government announces tougher penalties, new offences for abandoning victims and driving partners to suicide

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
The Victorian Labor government has pledged to introduce a maximum penalty of life imprisonment for rape and a series of new family violence offences, including an Australian-first law criminalising the abandonment of victims in need of urgent medical help, as part of its re-election platform.

Announcing the reforms on Saturday, Premier Ben Carroll said the changes would target the violence that is ‘killing a Victorian woman every two weeks’.

The government, if re-elected in November, will increase maximum penalties for all serious sexual offences by five years, and raise the standard sentence for offenders who murder a current or former partner from 25 to 30 years.

Two new offences have been proposed. The first, an Australian-first, would criminalise family violence offenders who abandon victims in need of urgent medical care — inspired by the deaths of Narelle Simmons and Belinda Jones. The second would create a new form of manslaughter for abusers who drive their partners to suicide, responding to research showing women who experience domestic violence are three times more likely to have attempted suicide.

Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny said the changes would ‘hold perpetrators to account and set the standard for what Victorians will never tolerate’.

Labor also plans to amend evidence laws so courts can consider an accused's history of sexual abuse, including prior convictions for similar offending, as admissible evidence at trial. The Evidence Act would be altered to prohibit ‘humiliating’ and ‘invasive’ questioning techniques during cross-examination.

Opposition and legal groups are expected to scrutinise the proposals in the lead-up to the November election.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The reforms directly address Victoria's family violence crisis, where a woman is killed every two weeks according to the Premier.
  • If enacted, the new offences for abandoning victims and driving partners to suicide would be Australian-first laws, potentially setting a national precedent.
  • Changes to evidence laws could significantly alter how sexual offence trials are conducted, making it easier to admit prior offending history and banning certain cross-examination tactics.

Background

Victoria has been at the forefront of family violence reform since the 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence, which made 227 recommendations. The current Labor government has already introduced numerous measures, including the Family Violence Protection Act reforms and specialist family violence courts. These latest pledges build on that work, targeting specific gaps identified in high-profile cases such as those of Narelle Simmons and Belinda Jones, whose deaths involved an alleged failure by offenders to seek medical help.

Key Perspectives

Victims' advocates and family violence campaigners: Likely to welcome the tougher penalties and new offences, arguing they close dangerous loopholes and send a strong deterrent message. Legal professionals and defence bar: May raise concerns about the evidence changes, particularly the ability to admit prior convictions as evidence, which could be seen as undermining the presumption of innocence, and the restrictions on cross-examination as potentially limiting a defendant's right to a fair trial. Critics and civil libertarians: Could question whether increasing maximum penalties alone reduces offending, arguing for greater investment in prevention, perpetrator programs and support services instead of relying solely on harsher sentencing.

What to Watch

  • The outcome of the November state election, which will determine whether these pledges become law.
  • The specific drafting of the new manslaughter offence for driving a partner to suicide, a legally complex area that will require careful definition.
  • Response from the Victorian Bar and legal ethics bodies to the proposed changes to cross-examination rules.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.