WA Ombudsman Bevan Warner says focus is squarely on the state after predecessor's travel scandal

New watchdog has visited 16 regions in first 12 months and pledges to stay home after Chris Field's corruption finding

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Bevan Warner, who replaced Chris Field as Western Australia's Ombudsman in May 2025, says his focus is squarely on Western Australia as the office rebuilds from a corruption scandal that saw his predecessor resign. Warner has visited 16 regions in his first 12 months, and says he has no plans to travel overseas without the premier's approval.

Bevan Warner acknowledges that for most West Australians, the only thing they know about his predecessor was that he was partial to international travel.

In 2024 the Ombudsman's office was thrust into the public spotlight when the Corruption and Crime Commission probed former Ombudsman Chris Field's extensive international travel portfolio in the final two years of his 17-year tenure. Field resigned hours after the commission released a scathing report accusing him of serious misconduct for failing to seek ministerial approval for international travel in his role as head of the International Ombudsman Institute between 2022 and 2023.

Warner, who took over in May 2025, concedes morale at the organisation was "very low". He says the travel issue has been resolved, but that does not mean he and his team are not still travelling.

"I can't independently travel out of the country without the approval of the premier," he said.

"I don't have any plans to travel outside the country, I think the focus of the role should squarely be on WA."

His first trip was to the East Kimberley, and the office has been to 16 different regions in the last 12 months.

Warner, who was born and raised in WA, offers a colourful personal history. Out of school he studied philosophy, Latin and politics at UWA for about six weeks before quitting to surf for a year. He returned to university to study commerce, which he said was fashionable at the time.

"I self sabotaged after a couple of years. I did two and a half years and I realised that if I completed the degree, I'd probably end up an accountant," he said.

He describes a driving belief behind his work: "All powerful institutions, government, corporations, sporting codes, ultimately act in their own interest."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Ombudsman is the independent watchdog tasked with exposing and fixing failures of government, and the office is rebuilding after its credibility was damaged by the Field scandal.
  • Warner's early focus on regional Western Australia signals an attempt to take the office beyond Perth and restore public confidence.
  • The strict travel rules imposed on the role are a direct response to the misconduct finding and test the office's ability to operate independently.

Background

Ombudsman offices exist to investigate complaints about government and administrative conduct, acting as a check on executive power. In 2024, the WA office went from relative obscurity to national attention when the Corruption and Crime Commission found that Chris Field, the previous Ombudsman, had engaged in serious misconduct over international travel taken without ministerial approval. Field resigned hours after the report was released. Bevan Warner was appointed to replace him in May 2025, inheriting an organisation with low morale and a need to restore public trust.

Key Perspectives

Bevan Warner: He argues the role's focus should be squarely on Western Australia, pointing to 16 regional visits in his first 12 months and saying he has no plans to travel overseas. He frames powerful institutions as inherently self-interested, which is why an independent advocate is needed. The public and government: The premier's approval is now required for any overseas travel by the Ombudsman, a safeguard intended to prevent a repeat of the Field episode and reassure the community that public money is being spent properly. Critics and skeptics: The scandal damaged the office's standing, and some may question whether requiring the Ombudsman to seek the premier's approval for travel compromises the independence of a role designed to hold government to account.

What to Watch

  • Whether Warner continues his regional visitation program and what complaints emerge from those areas.
  • Any findings or recommendations from Warner's office that test his relationship with the state government.
  • Whether the travel approval rules are applied consistently and whether any future overseas travel by the Ombudsman attracts scrutiny.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe