WA rules out shark cull as spending on helicopter and drone patrols nearly doubles

Why This Matters

• Beachgoers in Perth face heightened shark danger following three fatal attacks this year, including one last month at Sorrento Beach.
• The government has chosen surveillance over lethal controls, signalling a policy direction that other states may follow.
• Increased patrols aim to improve detection and warning times but do not remove the threat.

Background

Western Australia has a long history of shark attacks along its coastline. The state has debated various mitigation strategies, including culling and drum lines, against non-lethal surveillance methods. Great white sharks are a protected species, and the government must balance public safety with conservation obligations.

Key Perspectives

Fisheries Minister Jackie Jarvis: Argues there is no appetite for a shark cull, including incidental capture of great white sharks, and favours expanded aerial and drone surveillance. Surf Life Saving WA: Will receive $2.3 million for increased helicopter patrols and $1.2 million for more beach and drone patrols during peak times, improving detection capability. Critics/Skeptics: May argue that surveillance alone is insufficient to prevent attacks and that lethal measures are needed for high-risk situations.

What to Watch

• Whether the increased patrols lead to a measurable reduction in shark encounters.
• Future fatal attacks could reignite calls for culling or drum lines.
• The effectiveness of drone and helicopter monitoring in detecting sharks near swimmers.