World's timekeepers set to vote on abolishing leap second

Delegates meeting in Versailles this week expected to replace the leap second with a 'leap hour' for future centuries

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Delegates from the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) will meet near Versailles this week to vote on whether to permanently abandon the leap second, the occasional adjustment that has kept atomic clocks aligned with Earth’s rotation since 1972. If approved, the leap second would be replaced by a 'leap hour' that future generations would be asked to observe, likely centuries from now.

Leap seconds have been added 27 times over the past century, each time effectively making time go backwards for a second. The adjustments were necessary to reconcile the ultra-precise atomic clocks that underpin Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) with the Earth’s slightly variable rotation.

Earth’s spin is not perfectly uniform. While the planet’s rotation is generally slowing down due to the Moon’s gravitational pull, shorter-term factors can cause it to speed up. Since around 2020, Earth has been spinning faster. University of Tasmania geodesist Lucia McCallum said several things could affect the spin, including “atmosphere, wind, big ocean currents, glaciers melting, big volcanoes, redistribution of mass in the inner Earth.”

The traditional definition of a second — one 86,400th of a day — is no longer precise enough for technologies such as GPS, which rely on atomic time. In the late 1960s, the BIPM adopted a definition of the second based on caesium atoms, which is now the basis for UTC. Australia’s National Measurement Institute’s leader of time standards, Michael Wouters, noted that the atomic second was as close to the traditional second as possible, but “there was no exact value to begin with, because it was changing all the time.”

If the vote succeeds, the leap second will be scrapped, and future timekeepers may be asked to implement a leap hour instead — a larger adjustment that would not need to be made for generations.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The leap second causes periodic disruptions to computer systems and networks, which have to handle the extra second. Abolishing it would remove a recurring headache for engineers and operators of critical infrastructure.
  • GPS, telecommunications, financial markets, and power grids all depend on precise timekeeping. A change to the time standard affects how these systems synchronise globally.
  • The vote could set a precedent for how humanity manages the growing gap between atomic time and astronomical time over centuries, with the leap hour proposal deferring the problem rather than solving it incrementally.

Background

Leap seconds were introduced in 1972 to keep Coordinated Universal Time within 0.9 seconds of astronomical time, which is based on the Earth’s rotation. Over the decades, the Earth’s rotation has proven irregular — generally slowing because of tidal friction from the Moon, but occasionally speeding up due to geophysical processes such as atmospheric circulation, ocean currents, and changes in the Earth’s core. The 27 leap seconds added so far have all been positive (adding a second), reflecting the overall slowing trend. However, since 2020 the Earth has been spinning faster, raising the possibility that a negative leap second might be needed for the first time — a scenario that has caused concern among engineers because no system has ever tested it.

Key Perspectives

Timekeeping authorities (BIPM): The leap second is increasingly seen as an unnecessary complication for modern technology. Atomic time is far more stable and easier to manage than trying to keep UTC locked to an unpredictable natural cycle. The leap hour proposal pushes the adjustment far into the future, avoiding frequent disruptions. Technology and infrastructure operators: Companies that run large-scale distributed systems have long called for the abolition of leap seconds, which have caused notable outages in the past (e.g., the 2012 leap second caused problems for Reddit, LinkedIn, and others). A stable, continuous time scale would simplify software design and reduce failure risk. Astronomers and traditionalists: Some scientists argue that maintaining a connection between civil time and the Earth’s rotation has cultural and practical value, for example in navigation and celestial observations. They warn that completely decoupling time from the Earth’s spin could eventually lead to a drift where noon occurs at midnight centuries from now.

What to Watch

  • The outcome of the vote itself, expected later this week in Versailles. A simple majority may be enough, but the exact procedure and any opposition will be closely watched.
  • If the leap second is abolished, the timeline for its removal: existing leap seconds would be honoured, but no new ones added. Implementation may require international coordination across standards bodies.
  • The response of major technology companies and infrastructure operators: they may need to update software and hardware that assumes the continued use of leap seconds.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe