Writer says being an only child made her 'greedy for more friends'

Emma Babbington's essay challenges stereotypes and celebrates friendship in a personal reflection published by Brisbane Times and The Sydney Morning Herald

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
In a personal essay published on September 30, 2026, writer Emma Babbington reflects on how growing up as an only child shaped her approach to friendship, saying it made her 'greedy for more friends' and pushed back against stereotypes about only children.

Babbington, an only child whose mother was also an only child, writes that she sometimes feels a 'sting of envy' when she sees her friend's large family, imagining what it would be like to have sisters who are 'interconnected and woven into each other's lives and genes.'

She contrasts this with her own experience, observing that only children seem to fall into two camps: those who collect friendships, and those happiest in their own company. Babbington places herself 'joyously and unashamedly' in the first group.

'I love nothing more than meeting new people, and I really love a new best friend,' she writes. 'Being an only child means I'm always greedy for more friends. More connections. More sister substitutes.'

She credits her mother for this openness, recalling her mother's battle cry: 'I always socialised you!'

The essay suggests that growing up without siblings left her hungry for connection. She notes that her friend, one of several sisters, often jokes that she has 'enough friends' and no need for more acquaintances, a response Babbington attributes to being one of many siblings from the start.

For Babbington, being an only child means she is 'always greedy for more friends' and treats close friendships as 'sister substitutes.' The piece is a personal reflection rather than a scientific argument, but it offers a counterpoint to negative stereotypes about only children.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The essay adds a personal voice to long-running stereotypes about only children, who are often portrayed as lonely or spoiled.
  • It highlights how family structure can shape adult social habits, a topic relevant to parents, educators and only children themselves.
  • The piece also touches on the value of chosen family and friendship networks.

Background

Stereotypes about only children have persisted for generations. The author, herself an only child whose mother is also an only child, pushes back against these ideas, arguing that growing up without siblings made her more open to friendships. The essay observes that only children often fall into two groups: those who collect friends and those content with their own company, with the author identifying strongly with the former.

Key Perspectives

The author: Being an only child made her 'greedy for more friends' and she delights in finding 'sister substitutes' in close friendships. Her friend (with multiple sisters): She has 'enough friends' and no need for more acquaintances, a contrast the author attributes to growing up with siblings. Critics/Skeptics: The essay itself acknowledges not all only children are alike. Those wary of stereotyping might argue that personality, not family size, drives social behaviour, and that the author's experience is only one of many.

What to Watch

  • Whether the essay draws reader responses that broaden the conversation about only children and friendship.
  • Any follow-up pieces or research on how family size affects adult social networks.
  • Public reactions from other only children who may or may not recognise themselves in the author's account.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.