X removes 13,000 accounts in suspected foreign influence operations ahead of US midterms

Platform blames Iran, Russia and China but does not disclose evidence

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, announced it had removed more than 13,000 accounts involved in three suspected foreign influence campaigns targeting US political debate. The company attributed the operations to Iran, Russia and China, but did not publicly explain the basis for its attribution. The announcement comes ahead of the US midterm elections scheduled for November 3.

In a statement posted on Wednesday evening, X said it had “nuked” accounts that used inauthentic profiles to amplify political content about candidates and public figures across the political spectrum. The company described the moves as part of its effort to keep the conversation on its platform authentic, open and safe.

“People come to X to talk about what's happening in the world, including the upcoming 2026 US midterms,” the platform said. “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and we are proud that X is the global town square where these debates happen. Our job is to keep that conversation authentic, open, and safe.”

X also highlighted its Civic Integrity policy, which covers misleading information about how, when and where to vote, as well as content designed to discourage participation. Reports submitted under Civic Integrity are routed into requests for Community Notes, X’s crowdsourced fact-checking feature. The company says Community Notes is used alongside platform moderation and may label policy-breaking posts in critical cases.

Community Notes has faced scrutiny before. In 2023, the European Commission launched formal proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act and questioned the feature’s effectiveness in validating a post’s accuracy. X’s reliance on crowdsourced context follows significant layoffs and senior departures from its moderation teams after Elon Musk acquired the company.

Foreign influence campaigns are not confined to US elections. MI5 chief Sir Ken McCallum said this week that Russia had attempted to interfere in the 2016 Brexit referendum, but cautioned against treating that as evidence it changed the result.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The removal targets suspected foreign interference in US elections, which has become a key concern for democracies worldwide.
  • X’s use of crowdsourced moderation through Community Notes is tested as the platform tries to balance free speech and election integrity.
  • The announcement comes with less than three weeks until Election Day, placing pressure on both the platform and election officials.

Background

X, formerly Twitter, has undergone major changes to its content moderation approach since Elon Musk acquired the company in 2022. Key moderation teams were laid off, and the platform shifted toward relying on Community Notes, a crowdsourced system for adding context to posts. This system was questioned by the European Commission in 2023 under the Digital Services Act. The latest takedown reflects X’s continued effort to address inauthentic activity ahead of major elections.

Key Perspectives

X: The company frames the takedown as a necessary measure to protect authentic political debate on its platform, which it calls a “global town square”. It emphasises free speech but also notes its Civic Integrity policy as a safeguard.

Critics and skeptics: The lack of evidence provided for the attribution to Iran, Russia and China raises questions about the basis for the removals. The effectiveness of Community Notes has been doubted, notably by the European Commission, and the platform’s reduced moderation teams may limit its ability to respond quickly to influence operations.

What to Watch

  • The US midterm elections on November 3 will serve as a real-world test of X’s approach to handling political misinformation and foreign interference.
  • Further details from X on the nature of the accounts removed could emerge, potentially from third-party researchers or investigations.
  • Reactions from the US government, lawmakers and electoral authorities may shape calls for stronger platform regulation.

Sources

Discussion elsewhere

Hacker News46 points · 64 comments →

I'm sure this was done in a perfectly fair and balanced manner and not in a way that is at all aligned to the CEO's publicly stated politics.

stetrain on Hacker News

Meanwhile: https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-midterms-republicans-do... Manipulation of elections is OK as long as you do it with money.

voidhorse on Hacker News

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe