← All concepts

skill evolution

Imagine an AI agent following a set of instructions. Skill evolution lets it rewrite those instructions based on practice runs. The papers show this often backfires: the agent learns wrong lessons, deletes useful rules, or settles for a decent fix instead of a great one.

The shared lesson is that disciplined reflection beats raw trial and error. Some methods use a memory bank to distill experience across attempts, reducing noise. Others branch the search across multiple versions instead of updating a single line, or adaptively choose how to revise. Across benchmarks, these structured approaches consistently yielded more robust and transferable skills.

Papers
42
Released code
5
First seen
June 2026
Latest
Nov 2026

37 papers in the last two months, against 4 in the two before.

Start here

Three papers to read first, in the order they came out
  1. 1Contrasting group executions pinpoints which agent skill caused success or failure

    GRSE compares multiple executions of the same question to assign credit to the responsible agent and skill, outperforming prior methods.

    Oct 2026
  2. 2AI agents can rewrite their improvement routines, outperforming human-written instructions

    Skill∞ recursively improves both task skills and the meta-skill used to optimize them.

    Oct 2026
  3. 3Language model and skill set co-evolve through response feedback

    SkillDuet coordinates model parameter updates and skill retention using response feedback, achieving 98.57% on ALFWorld and 92.97% on WebShop.

    Nov 2026

Who is working on it

Ant Group 4Amazon 3Georgia Institute of Technology 2Peking University 2Fudan University 2The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 2

The papers

Most central to this idea first, not most recent.

Concepts are extracted from each paper and reused across the corpus, so this page grows on its own as the desk reads.