Search

Benchmark

MMLU-PRO

Reported in 25 papers on Zotpaper. The latest, each as the paper states it:

All benchmarks →

3 results for “MMLU-Pro”

  1. Research · Agents

    Progressive pruning lets language-model debates beat equal-cost baselines

    Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning

    Conditional Progressive Pruning uses intermediate debate results and learned agent behavior to allocate computation across rounds more effectively.

    MMLU-Pro: 66.33% accuracy (as reported)

    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, University of Cambridge, Tsinghua University

  2. Research · Agents

    Revision-aware agent graphs reuse valid work while avoiding stale answers

    Revision-Aware Independent Agent Graphs for Dynamic Reasoning

    RIAG combines deterministic version selection, version-keyed caching and bounded independent reasoning to handle tasks revised over time.

    Full collection (6 benchmarks): 18 calls/query calls per query (as reported)

    Harvard AI and Robotics Lab, Harvard University

  3. Research · Agents

    Joint harness search balances model accuracy, safety, and token use

    MoMHa: Multi-Objective Optimization of LLM Harnesses over Accuracy, Safety, and Tokens

    Across 17 domains and 12 models, jointly optimizing the code around language models outperformed sequential and accuracy-only approaches.

    3D hypervolume: 0.36 hypervolume indicator (as reported)

    Adobe Research