Search

Benchmark

MMLU-PRO

Reported in 25 papers on Zotpaper. The latest, each as the paper states it:

All benchmarks →

9 results for “MMLU-Pro”

  1. Research · Evaluation & benchmarks

    Scaling curves can be certified with far fewer sampled answers

    Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curves

    A variance-aware audit provides simultaneous confidence bands across test-time budgets while reducing the number of generated answers.

    MMLU-Pro: 192000 generated answers (as reported)

    PMCC AI Lab, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network

  2. Research · Agents

    Progressive pruning lets language-model debates beat equal-cost baselines

    Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning

    Conditional Progressive Pruning uses intermediate debate results and learned agent behavior to allocate computation across rounds more effectively.

    MMLU-Pro: 66.33% accuracy (as reported)

    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, University of Cambridge, Tsinghua University

  3. Research · Reinforcement learning

    Turning failed reasoning attempts into training signal improves GRPO on hard problems

    Failure Is the Mother of Success: Recovering Supervision with Grounding Hindsight

    RSHD generates corrective notes from failures, verifies them via replays, and distills successful behaviors into the policy without extra inference cost.

    MMLU-Pro: 40.4% accuracy (as reported)

    University of California, San Diego, Adobe Research, University of Virginia

  4. Research · Language models

    Query-adaptive neuron steering improves frozen language models across benchmarks

    Query-Adaptive Neuron Steering for LLMs

    Q-NeuS uses each query’s internal activation pattern to select and scale neuron interventions without updating the underlying model.

    MMLU-Pro: 38.37% accuracy (as reported)

    Northeastern University, Washington University in St. Louis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  5. Research · Evaluation & benchmarks

    Language models’ own confidence becomes harder to outperform as they improve

    Predictable performance is suboptimal, and what it means for model routing

    Zhang and Hardt connect prediction gains beyond a model’s own confidence to its room for improvement, then test the relationship across 16 language models.

    MMLU-Pro: 0.65 Pearson correlation between empirical suboptimality and (as reported)

  6. Research · Language models

    Alternating context edits and logit steering boosts frozen LLM accuracy

    EMO: A Closed-Loop Test-Time Computation Framework via Alternating Context Optimization and Logits Steering

    EMO closes the loop between feedback-driven context revision and decoding-time distribution correction, improving zero-shot performance across eight models and six benchmarks.

    MMLU-Pro: 70.9% accuracy (as reported)

    Peking University, Samsung Research

  7. Research · Reinforcement learning

    Posterior rewards become indistinguishable for long reasoning traces in LLM training

    Rethinking Probability-Based Reinforcement Learning From Posterior Concentration

    The authors identify a length-dependent failure mode they call Posterior Concentration Phenomenon, and propose a framework to mitigate it.

    MMLU-Pro: 61.3% Avg@2 (as reported)

    National University of Singapore, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China

  8. Research · Agents

    Revision-aware agent graphs reuse valid work while avoiding stale answers

    Revision-Aware Independent Agent Graphs for Dynamic Reasoning

    RIAG combines deterministic version selection, version-keyed caching and bounded independent reasoning to handle tasks revised over time.

    Full collection (6 benchmarks): 18 calls/query calls per query (as reported)

    Harvard AI and Robotics Lab, Harvard University

  9. Research · Agents

    Joint harness search balances model accuracy, safety, and token use

    MoMHa: Multi-Objective Optimization of LLM Harnesses over Accuracy, Safety, and Tokens

    Across 17 domains and 12 models, jointly optimizing the code around language models outperformed sequential and accuracy-only approaches.

    3D hypervolume: 0.48 hypervolume indicator (as reported)

    Adobe Research