Search

Benchmark

MMLU-PRO

Reported in 25 papers on Zotpaper. The latest, each as the paper states it:

All benchmarks →

6 results for “MMLU-Pro”

  1. Research · Evaluation & benchmarks

    Scaling curves can be certified with far fewer sampled answers

    Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curves

    A variance-aware audit provides simultaneous confidence bands across test-time budgets while reducing the number of generated answers.

    MMLU-Pro: 192000 generated answers (as reported)

    PMCC AI Lab, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network

  2. Research · Reinforcement learning

    Turning failed reasoning attempts into training signal improves GRPO on hard problems

    Failure Is the Mother of Success: Recovering Supervision with Grounding Hindsight

    RSHD generates corrective notes from failures, verifies them via replays, and distills successful behaviors into the policy without extra inference cost.

    MMLU-Pro: 60.7% accuracy (as reported)

    University of California, San Diego, Adobe Research, University of Virginia

  3. Research · Language models

    Query-adaptive neuron steering improves frozen language models across benchmarks

    Query-Adaptive Neuron Steering for LLMs

    Q-NeuS uses each query’s internal activation pattern to select and scale neuron interventions without updating the underlying model.

    MMLU-Pro: 59.11% accuracy (as reported)

    Northeastern University, Washington University in St. Louis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  4. Research · Evaluation & benchmarks

    Language models’ own confidence becomes harder to outperform as they improve

    Predictable performance is suboptimal, and what it means for model routing

    Zhang and Hardt connect prediction gains beyond a model’s own confidence to its room for improvement, then test the relationship across 16 language models.

    MMLU-Pro: 0.65 Pearson correlation between empirical suboptimality and (as reported)

  5. Research · Language models

    Alternating context edits and logit steering boosts frozen LLM accuracy

    EMO: A Closed-Loop Test-Time Computation Framework via Alternating Context Optimization and Logits Steering

    EMO closes the loop between feedback-driven context revision and decoding-time distribution correction, improving zero-shot performance across eight models and six benchmarks.

    MMLU-Pro: 3.76 pts accuracy improvement over TextGrad (as reported)

    Peking University, Samsung Research

  6. Research · Reinforcement learning

    Posterior rewards become indistinguishable for long reasoning traces in LLM training

    Rethinking Probability-Based Reinforcement Learning From Posterior Concentration

    The authors identify a length-dependent failure mode they call Posterior Concentration Phenomenon, and propose a framework to mitigate it.

    MMLU-Pro: 61.3% Avg@2 (as reported)

    National University of Singapore, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China