Advocates warn migration crackdown may fuel coercive control and visa-related abuse

Lawyer says overstayer enforcement hands perpetrators more power over partners

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Domestic violence victim-survivor advocates are warning that federal government and opposition proposals to crack down on visa overstayers will embolden abusers who weaponise Australia's migration system, including through threats of deportation, visa cancellation and detention.

The warning comes as both major parties push to overhaul the migration system. Immigration Minister Tony Burke has flagged a return to pre-2015 policy under which visa overstayers were placed in immigration detention centres, while the Coalition this week proposed reinstating intelligence functions in the Department of Home Affairs to target overstayers.

Immigration lawyer Ann Emmanuel, principal solicitor at the Immigration Advice and Rights Centre, NSW's only specialist community legal centre covering all migration and visa types, said the crackdown would increase risk for people already in vulnerable positions.

"In my view, the crackdown hands perpetrators more power," she said. Ms Emmanuel estimated that more than 80 per cent of clients at the centre's main legal practice faced immigration-related domestic and family violence (DFV) issues.

She said perpetrators often controlled their partner's visa application process, passports and interactions with Home Affairs. Some clients discovered during appointments that they were in Australia unlawfully because a partner never lodged a visa application, or never told them an application had been rejected.

"It's putting victim-survivors in a greater risk of potentially being put in some form of immigration detention when they've done nothing wrong through any fault of their own," she said.

The experts say the immigration system has long been documented as a tool of DFV, including threats to cancel a visa, report someone to Home Affairs for potential detention or deportation, or separate an Australian-born child from a parent.

Anyone experiencing domestic or family violence can contact 1800 Respect (1800 737 732), MensLine Australia (1300 789 978) or the Men's Referral Service (1300 766 491).

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • A tougher enforcement regime could push victim-survivors further into the shadows, making them afraid to seek help in case of immigration consequences.
  • Survivors on temporary visas typically have fewer safety pathways than permanent residents, and abuse of visa status is a documented pattern of DFV.
  • The design of the new migration laws will determine what protections exist for people fleeing abuse.

Background

Australia's migration system has long included family violence provisions that allow certain visa holders to apply for permanent residency after fleeing an abusive relationship. The current debate centres on enforcement: Mr Burke has flagged returning to the pre-2015 practice of detaining visa overstayers, and the Coalition wants intelligence functions rebuilt within Home Affairs. Advocates argue that without safeguards, these measures give perpetrators material to exploit against their partners.

Key Perspectives

Victim-survivor advocates and immigration lawyers: The crackdown increases risk for people already experiencing visa-related control, and detention is a live threat for survivors who have done nothing wrong. The federal government: Detaining overstayers restores integrity to the migration system and deters visa non-compliance. The Coalition: Intelligence-led targeting of overstayers strengthens enforcement of migration law. Critics and sceptics: Harsher enforcement without clear protections for abuse victims will deter people from reporting violence and could increase coercive control.

What to Watch

  • The detail of both proposals as they move toward legislation, particularly any family violence safeguards.
  • How the government defines and implements the return to pre-2015 detention arrangements.
  • Whether specialist legal services report a rise in immigration-related DFV cases as enforcement ramps up.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe