Models trained on different types of data, like images and text, often develop incompatible representations. This makes it hard to combine them for tasks like captioning. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis suggested they converge as models scale, but without proof.
The authors proved that when models use (JEPAs) with positive pairs that are two observations of the same scene, good views, they learn the same representation up to a rotation. They also showed that next-token prediction is a bad-view JEPA, which explains its inefficiency.
Good views need 42 times fewer training samples than next-token prediction to reach the same alignment. A small text JEPA outperformed language models up to 72 billion parameters in aligning with vision. This shows that aligning representations comes from positive views, not just scale.
