Almost 80,000 older Australians forecast to quit private health under rebate changes

FOI documents show the government's cited figure of 44,000 nearly doubles within a year

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Nearly 80,000 older Australians are expected to abandon their private health cover by the end of the decade under the federal government's proposed changes to the over-65s rebate, newly released departmental analysis shows. The figure is almost double the 44,000 estimate the government has repeatedly cited in defence of the policy.

Health department analysis released under Freedom of Information laws shows that while 44,000 Australians are expected to drop their cover in 2028-29, that forecast rises to 78,000 just one year later.

The proposal would wind back the rebate Australians aged 65 and over receive on their private health cover, banking about $3 billion to spend elsewhere in the aged care system. The federal government is counting on those savings, having already promised to funnel the money into other major aged care commitments.

The Coalition said Health Minister Mark Butler had consistently used the smaller figure to defend the policy. Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston said older Australians cannot afford to live without private health insurance. "Either he didn't read his own briefs, or he's been deliberately misleading older Australians," she said.

The health department said the 44,000 estimate represented the "initial effect of the policy at a point in time" and noted the figures were subject to uncertainty, as they were based on historical data and responses that might not reflect future behaviour under new policy settings.

The proposal has drawn concern from the states and territories, aged care advocates and the private health insurance industry, who have questioned whether it would heap pressure on the public health system and affect vulnerable older Australians.

With the Coalition vowing to block the legislation in the Senate, the federal government must get the Greens on board for the bill to pass. The minor party said last week it would not support the legislation in its current form and is now canvassing options to amend it, such as exempting pensioners from the changes.

Last month the ABC revealed about $1.6 billion of the forecast savings would be clawed back from pensioners, according to Parliamentary Budget Office analysis. Departmental figures also show that of the more than 3.2 million older Australians affected by the changes, about 2 million live on less than $37,000 a year.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The legislation determines whether the government can redirect about $3 billion in savings to aged care commitments it has already promised.
  • If the higher estimate eventuates, more older Australians could shift from private to public care, adding pressure to public hospitals.
  • With the Coalition opposed, the Greens effectively control whether the bill passes the Senate.

Background

The federal government subsidises private health insurance premiums through a rebate, with higher rates for older Australians. The proposal would wind back that rebate for people aged 65 and over, generating savings the government says will be spent elsewhere in the aged care system. The Coalition opposes the change, while states and territories, aged care advocates and insurers have all raised concerns about the consequences for the public health system and for vulnerable older Australians.

Key Perspectives

The federal government: Says the changes will free up about $3 billion for aged care and argues the 44,000 figure represents the initial effect of the policy at a point in time, with estimates subject to uncertainty. The Coalition: Accuses Health Minister Mark Butler of relying on the smaller figure to sell the policy. Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston says older Australians cannot afford to live without private health insurance. States, territories, aged care advocates and insurers: Warn the changes could push pressure onto the public system and harm vulnerable older Australians. The Greens: Have refused to support the legislation in its current form and are considering amendments, including exempting pensioners.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Greens and the government reach agreement on amendments before the bill comes to a vote.
  • Parliamentary Budget Office scrutiny of the savings estimate, after analysis found about $1.6 billion would be clawed back from pensioners.
  • Any shift in the government's public defence of the policy, given the discrepancy between the two departmental figures.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe