Australia records worst-ever maths and reading scores in global PISA test

More than half of 15-year-olds fail to meet national proficiency standard in mathematics

edit
By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Australian high school students have scored their lowest-ever results in maths and reading on the Programme for International Student Assessment, with the long-term learning decline continuing despite a slight improvement in science. More than half of 15-year-olds did not achieve the national proficiency standard in maths, according to the 2025 results released today.

The latest PISA exams, which assess 15-year-old students across 91 countries and economies, show Australia ranking 10th in science and reading and 16th in mathematics, above the OECD average. However, the long-term trend reveals significant declines: reading scores are roughly two years of learning behind where they were in 2000, and mathematics scores are a little over two years behind the 2003 results. Science students today are almost one year behind their peers who sat the exam in 2006.

Jonas Bertling from the Australian Council for Educational Research, which administers the test, said the data shows long-term declines in reading and mathematics but that science scores have stabilised. "While we see some declines in the long run, we're still a very strong country," Mr Bertling said.

Blaise Joseph from the Centre for Independent Studies think tank described the long-term picture as "troubling", noting fewer high performers and more low performers across all three subjects. He attributed the lack of learning growth to classroom disruption, saying "students cannot learn effectively when classrooms are regularly disrupted".

Australian students reported improved discipline compared to earlier findings but remained among the lowest-ranked countries on that measure, placing 69th out of 80. Twenty-one per cent said they could not work well in most or all lessons, compared to the OECD average of 19 per cent, while 41 per cent reported noise and disorder in their classrooms, well above the OECD average of 31 per cent. The findings echo a report released last week which found one-third of lesson time was being lost to misbehaviour.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The long-term decline in foundational skills affects Australia’s future workforce competitiveness and economic productivity.
  • Persistent classroom disruption undermines learning for all students and may widen existing achievement gaps.
  • The results will likely intensify debate about education policy, curriculum reform and school discipline approaches.

Background

The Programme for International Student Assessment is run by the OECD every three years and measures the skills of 15-year-olds in reading, mathematics and science. Australia has participated since 2000, and the 2025 results continue a downward trend that has been apparent over the past decade. The test is widely used to benchmark national education systems against international peers.

Key Perspectives

ACER and OECD: Jonas Bertling emphasises that while long-term declines are real, Australia remains a strong performer overall, ranking in the top 10 for science and reading among participating countries. Centre for Independent Studies: Blaise Joseph argues the decline is “troubling” and points to classroom disruption as a key driver, calling for clearer expectations and consistent behaviour management. Critics/Skeptics: Some educators may argue that PISA does not capture the full picture of student learning, and that overemphasis on test scores can lead to narrow curricula.

What to Watch

  • Policy responses from federal and state education ministers, including any new discipline or curriculum initiatives.
  • Whether the next PISA results in 2028 show a reversal of the long-term decline.
  • Continued tracking of classroom behaviour data and the impact of any intervention programs.

Sources

newspaper

Zotpaper

Articles published under the Zotpaper byline are synthesized from multiple source publications by our AI editor and reviewed by our editorial process. Each story combines reporting from credible outlets to give readers a balanced, comprehensive view.