Badenoch pledge to scrap future homes standard would raise household bills, critics warn

Conservatives propose dropping solar panels and heat pump requirements for new builds as part of leadership bid

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Kemi Badenoch has made scrapping the future homes standard (FHS) a central plank of her Conservative leadership campaign, a move that critics say would lock millions of new homes into higher energy bills for decades and disrupt supply chains already geared up for the policy.

The future homes standard, due to take effect, would have required all new homes to be built with solar panels, heat pumps, high-grade insulation and other low-carbon measures. Badenoch's proposal would remove those requirements, arguing that they add cost at a time when the UK needs to accelerate housebuilding.

However, the Guardian reports that the Tories have quoted construction costs of £30,000 per home for complying with the standard, while independent estimates put the cost at £5,000 to £8,000 at the point of building, a figure from 2024 when energy prices were lower. The savings for households are estimated at more than £1,300 a year on bills, a saving likely to be substantially higher now. Retrofitting homes after construction would cost more than £20,000.

Jan Rosenow, professor of climate and energy policy at the University of Oxford, said: "Every home constructed today that runs on fossil fuels is a liability for the occupants. It also results in investor uncertainty and disrupts the supply chain that has been gearing up for this. What we need is less political point scoring and more long-term clarity."

Simon McWhirter, chief executive of the UK Green Building Council, said: "The housebuilding industry has spent years preparing for the introduction of the FHS, investing in skills, supply chains and new products. Reversing course would … risk slowing progress towards building the homes that people want and need."

The policy is part of a broader rollback of green commitments announced at the Conservative party conference, including plans to abolish the Environment Agency and Natural England, despite ongoing crises over sewage and farm pollution and dramatic declines in wildlife.

The UK needs approximately 6 million new homes, according to the Guardian report, and failing to equip them with efficient, low-carbon energy sources would lock in higher bills for occupants for decades.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Millions of new homes built without efficiency measures could saddle UK households with hundreds of pounds in extra annual energy costs for decades.
  • The move threatens the UK's legally binding net-zero emissions target and could undermine investor confidence in low-carbon supply chains.
  • Scrapping green building standards now would make retrofitting far more expensive later, raising overall costs to homeowners and the state.

Background

The future homes standard was developed over several years to ensure new homes from 2025 onward would have low-carbon heating and high energy efficiency. It had cross-party support in its early stages. At the Conservative party conference, Kemi Badenoch positioned herself as a leadership contender by rejecting the policy as too costly for builders and buyers, even as the construction industry had already begun preparing for compliance.

Key Perspectives

[Homebuyers and tenants]: They would face lower upfront costs if standards are dropped, but substantially higher energy bills and potentially lower property values as fossil-fuel homes become less desirable. [Housebuilders]: The industry is split. Some welcome reduced upfront costs and regulation, while others — particularly those already invested in green supply chains — warn of disruption and investor uncertainty after years of preparation. [Environmental and consumer groups]: They argue the policy is short-sighted, that the real cost of compliance is a fraction of what the Conservatives claim, and that failing to build efficient homes now will make the UK's net-zero goal unachievable.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Conservatives formally adopt the FHS scrapping in their election manifesto.
  • The next general election timetable and whether Labour or other parties commit to retaining or strengthening the standard.
  • Independent cost and savings analyses from UKGBC or other bodies as the debate intensifies.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe