According to an excerpt from the book reported by the Guardian, Badenoch directly contacted several cabinet colleagues to sound them out about replacing Sunak as party leader. Seldon, who has written political biographies of every prime minister since John Major, portrays the plot as a behind-the-scenes effort to force a change at the top well before the 2024 general election campaign was in full swing.
The book does not name the ministers Badenoch allegedly contacted, nor does it specify whether any of them expressed willingness to join the move. At the time, Badenoch was serving as Business Secretary in Sunak’s government, a position she held until the election. She has been a prominent figure on the right of the Conservative Party and was widely seen as a potential future leadership contender.
The claim, if true, would represent one of the most serious internal challenges to Sunak’s authority during his premiership, which began in October 2022 after Liz Truss’s brief tenure. Conservative MPs had already been deeply divided over policy direction, and Sunak struggled to unify the party amid a large polling deficit against Labour.
Badenoch has not yet publicly responded to the allegation. A spokesperson for the former business secretary declined to comment when approached by the Guardian. Neither Sunak’s office nor the Conservative Party headquarters has issued a statement.
Political analysts note that the timing of the alleged plot – months before the election – suggests that Badenoch and other senior Tories were already pessimistic about the party’s electoral prospects and were considering a leadership change to improve their chances. However, no such change occurred, and Sunak led the Conservatives into the election, which resulted in a landslide victory for Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.
The book is expected to be released later this week and will likely contain further revelations about the internal dynamics of the Conservative government in the run-up to the election. Seldon’s previous works have been praised for their detailed sourcing and insider accounts, though they have also faced criticism for over-reliance on unnamed sources.