Rooney, author of Normal People and Conversations with Friends, halted UK sales of her books after Palestine Action was proscribed in July last year. The group became the first direct action organisation to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as al-Qaida and Boko Haram. Rooney had said she would use proceeds from her sales to support the group. Providing money one knows or has reasonable cause to suspect will or may be used for terrorism carries a maximum jail term of 14 years.
Chris Haughton, whose books have sold millions worldwide, told the Guardian he wanted to express 'full support' for Rooney. 'As someone who is in the UK a lot of the time, I can't do what she has done, but I can support her instead of supporting Palestine Action,' he said. 'As authors, we need to be focused on freedom of expression, this is everything we're about, and this is just showing solidarity with an author who has bravely spoken out. The entire situation is just a farce. Sending Sally Rooney the money adds another level of absurdity to this absurd situation, it's making a mockery of the law.' Haughton said he has been arrested twice for holding placards allegedly supporting Palestine Action. The alleged offence carries a maximum sentence of six months in prison.
Nicola Davies, author of The Day War Came, about a child refugee, said: 'I can't say that I am standing up for the children of Wales if I allow the children of Gaza to be murdered and mutilated without comment. Gaza is smaller than the Welsh county of Flintshire, and it's as if all Wales's children were concentrated there and being bombed. So I support Sally Rooney in the stand she's taken, and when my half-year royalties arrive shortly, I will donate to her the royalties from my book The Day War Came, whose sales have been boosted by the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine.'
At prime minister's questions on Wednesday, Andy Burnham was asked whether he would review the ban on Palestine Action in light of Rooney's situation. Burnham said proscription 'followed a rigorous and evidence-based process that came before this house, endorsed by parliament'. He said he would not comment further given that the Supreme Court is due to hear a legal challenge to the ban on 4 and 5 November. The challenge argues that the ban interferes disproportionately with the rights to freedom of expression and protest.