Colombian police 'have no record' of AFP anti-drug taskforce, joint investigation finds

AFP says Bogotá-based joint investigations team is not yet operational, pointing to annex agreement signed in August

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time4 min
Two Colombian police departments on the front line of the country's drug war say they have no record of the Australian Federal Police's newly announced anti-drugs taskforce, according to a joint investigation by the ABC and the newspaper El Tiempo. The AFP insists the international joint investigations team, announced in May, is not yet operational and says an annex agreement signed in August will allow it to target transnational crime.

A joint investigation by the ABC and the Colombian newspaper El Tiempo has found that two police departments on the front line of Colombia's fight against drug cartels say they have no evidence of an agreement with the Australian Federal Police for its newly announced anti-drugs taskforce.

In May, AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett announced the AFP and New Zealand Police would fund an international joint investigations team (IJIT) based in the capital Bogotá “to gather evidence about illicit drug shipments”. The team would include AFP officers working with Colombian, US, INTERPOL and Mexican authorities to curb the flow of drugs through the Pacific to Australia, the commissioner said.

In a response to a freedom of information request filed by El Tiempo and shared with the ABC, the anti-narcotics department of Colombia's National Police (PNC) said it had no recorded data showing subscribed “protocols, agreements, or procedures” relating to the IJIT. The department said drug-related intelligence had not been shared with the AFP and no “operational activities” such as illicit substance seizures or arrests had been made in cooperation with Australian police as part of the team.

It said there was currently only a “letter of intent” outlining a “framework for cooperation and exchange of information”, which the ABC understands was signed jointly by PNC Major General Jesús Alejandro Barrera Peña and the AFP in August. “The instrument does not identify the so-called 'IJIT', nor does it establish specific functions, responsibilities or procedures for this department in relation to said mechanism,” the department said. The letter made no connection between the IJIT and joint drug seizures, destruction of narcotics production infrastructure, disruption of criminal groups or identification of international trafficking routes.

The ABC understands the IJIT agreement was made with, and is expected to be overseen by, the PNC's Office of International Relations and Cooperation (ORECI), which coordinates Colombia's international policing efforts, rather than the anti-narcotics department.

An AFP spokesperson told the ABC the IJIT was not yet operational, but an “annex” agreement was made with the PNC in August, in addition to the letter of intent, that would allow the taskforce to “focus on transnational organised crime networks”. The AFP did not specify when the IJIT would become operational.

In a separate response shared with the ABC, the PNC's criminal investigations department said it had no data able to determine whether the AFP was involved, supported, funded or shared intelligence in 174 drug trafficking investigations conducted between January 1, 2025 and October 6 this year. It also said it had no knowledge of Colombian anti-narcotics intelligence being used to identify, locate, track, monitor or intercept suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Pacific Ocean or Caribbean Sea as part of the IJIT.

The findings follow questions ABC put to the AFP in June about the IJIT's allocated budget, operational commitments and how its success would be measured. The AFP said it held 60 documents answering the questions but declined to release them, citing national security and international relations concerns, saying at the time that the IJIT was “still in the negotiation phase” and that publication could harm relations between Australia and Colombia.

In this year's federal budget, more than $1.16 million was allocated to the AFP for “ordinary annual services” in policing assistance efforts abroad and on Australian external territories in 2026-27, expected to rise to $1.4 million next year before dropping in the following two years. The budget does not detail how much is set aside specifically for the IJIT.

Commissioner Barrett said 17 tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, had been seized by “local and international” police since January this year and stopped from reaching Australia through the Pacific. The ABC understands that, to July, most of the offshore seizures were made in French Polynesia, AFP officers were not physically involved in any interceptions and none were in Australian territorial waters.

The PNC this month announced an Australian-Iranian national, Arash Ebrahimi Far, was detained in Colombia as a subject of an INTERPOL Red Notice for alleged drug trafficking and money laundering. The case is not believed to be related to the IJIT.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Months after the AFP publicly announced the Bogotá-based taskforce, Colombia's frontline drug police say they have no documented agreements, intelligence sharing or joint operations tied to it, raising questions about what has been delivered.
  • The taskforce is part of Australia's strategy to stop cocaine shipments crossing the Pacific, a route the AFP says has already seen 17 tonnes of illicit drugs seized this year.
  • Australian taxpayers are funding expanded AFP policing abroad, but the federal budget does not say how much is committed to the IJIT specifically.

Background

Colombia is one of the world's largest producers of cocaine, and South American trafficking networks increasingly ship drugs across the Pacific toward Australian markets. The AFP has pursued an offshore interdiction strategy, working with partner agencies to intercept shipments before they reach Australian waters. The IJIT was announced in May as a joint AFP and New Zealand Police initiative, intended to gather evidence about illicit drug shipments in cooperation with Colombian, US, INTERPOL and Mexican authorities. The disagreement between the AFP and Colombia's frontline police departments is over how much of that arrangement exists in practice.

Key Perspectives

Australian Federal Police: The IJIT is not yet operational. The AFP says an annex agreement with Colombia's National Police, signed in August, will allow the taskforce to focus on transnational organised crime networks, and it declined to release planning documents citing national security and international relations concerns.

Colombian National Police (frontline departments): The anti-narcotics department says it has no recorded protocols, agreements or procedures relating to the IJIT, has not shared drug intelligence with the AFP and has conducted no joint seizures or arrests under the arrangement. It says only a letter of intent exists, and that document does not name the IJIT. The criminal investigations department cannot determine whether the AFP was involved in any of 174 drug trafficking investigations.

PNC Office of International Relations and Cooperation: The office the ABC understands the IJIT agreement was made with, and which coordinates Colombia's international policing efforts. Its role may explain why frontline departments say they have no record of the agreement.

Critics and skeptics: The gap between the AFP's public announcement and the documented record on the Colombian side raises questions about how the taskforce's success will be measured and whether operational details have been settled between the two countries.

What to Watch

  • Whether the AFP names a date for the IJIT to become operational, which would resolve the discrepancy between its announcement and Colombia's records.
  • Whether ORECI or the AFP releases the August annex agreement, which would clarify the taskforce's actual scope and responsibilities.
  • Whether future Pacific drug seizures are publicly attributed to IJIT cooperation, and how the AFP reports the $1.16 million-plus budget line for overseas policing.

Sources

Checked

10 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 7 supported.

Show each claim
  1. Partly supportedColombian police have no record of the AFP taskforce.Just In: “the anti-narcotics department of Colombia's National Police (PNC) has no recorded data that shows subscribed “protocols, agreements, or procedures” relating to the IJIT.”
  2. SupportedTwo Colombian police departments say they have no evidence of an agreement with the AFP for the taskforce.Just In: “Two police departments on the frontline of Colombia's fight against cartels say they have no evidence of an agreement with the Australian Federal Police (AFP) for its newly announced anti-drugs taskforce”
  3. SupportedThe ABC and El Tiempo jointly investigated the police departments’ statements.Just In: “A joint investigation by the ABC and the Colombian newspaper El Tiempo can reveal”
  4. SupportedThe AFP says the IJIT is not yet operational, and an annex agreement made with the PNC in August would allow it to focus on transnational organised crime networks.Just In: “An AFP spokesperson told the ABC the IJIT was not yet operational, but an “annex” agreement was made with the PNC in August in addition to the letter of intent that would allow the taskforce to “focus on transnational organised crime networks”.”
  5. Partly supportedThe AFP had 60 documents answering ABC questions about the IJIT.Just In: “In response, the AFP said it had 60 documents that would answer the questions.”
  6. SupportedThe anti-narcotics department said drug-related intelligence had not been shared with the AFP and no IJIT operational activities had been carried out with Australian police.Just In: “the department said drug-related intelligence had not been shared with the AFP and no “operational activities” such as illicit substance seizures or arrests had been made in cooperation with Australian police as part of the IJIT.”
  7. SupportedA separate PNC department had no data to determine AFP involvement in 174 drug-trafficking investigations from January 1, 2025 to October 6 that year.Just In: “the PNC's criminal investigations department said it had no data that was able to determine whether the AFP was involved, supported, funded or shared intelligence in 174 drug trafficking investigations conducted between January 1, 2025 and October 6 this year.”
  8. SupportedCommissioner Barrett said local and international police had seized 17 tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, since January and stopped them reaching Australia through the Pacific.Just In: “Commissioner Barrett said 17 tonnes of illicit drugs, mostly cocaine, have been seized by “local and international” police since January this year and stopped from reaching Australia through the Pacific.”
  9. SupportedThe AFP said the IJIT was “still in the negotiation phase”.Just In: “said at the time that the IJIT was “still in the negotiation phase”.”
  10. Partly supportedThe story characterises the AFP as insisting the IJIT is not yet operational.Just In: “An AFP spokesperson told the ABC the IJIT was not yet operational”

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the World desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source7 of 10 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe