Constitutional expert accuses Albanese government of 'grey corruption' over $6m golf club grant

Anne Twomey tells Senate inquiry the grants system is a 'farce' that dressed up political favours as policy

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
A leading constitutional scholar has labelled a $6 million grant from the Albanese government to the Prime Minister's local golf club as 'grey corruption', telling a Senate inquiry the system was a 'farce' that effectively handed out 'gifts of political largesse, funded by taxpayers'.

University of Sydney professor emerita Anne Twomey delivered a blistering assessment of the Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program in a submission to a Senate inquiry, warning that politicians needed 'lessons in both federalism and integrity' before promising taxpayer money to local projects.

The inquiry was triggered by a September investigation from the Centre for Public Integrity, which found nearly three-quarters of the $560.9 million program was allocated to notionally Labor-held or competitive seats.

Twomey noted that Marrickville Golf Club, in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's electorate of Grayndler, had already received five federal grants totalling almost $58,000 before Albanese promised it the $6 million during the 2025 election campaign. Those earlier grants were made through closed, non-competitive programs where local MPs could nominate organisations, meaning there was no meaningful comparison with other projects to establish need.

'They were effectively gifts of political largesse, funded by taxpayers,' Twomey wrote in her submission.

Twomey also said the original design of the program was constitutionally invalid because the Commonwealth lacked a general power to directly fund local sporting and community facilities. The scheme was later altered so grants could flow through state or local government bodies under section 96 of the Constitution, which Twomey said appeared to make the Marrickville grant constitutionally valid.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The controversy raises questions about how federal grants are awarded and whether the system prioritises political advantage over genuine community need.
  • Taxpayer money is at the centre of the dispute, with the program totalling $560.9 million and the Prime Minister's electorate receiving a $6 million grant.
  • The Senate inquiry's findings could lead to reforms in how local infrastructure grants are administered and scrutinised.

Background

The Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program was designed to fund community projects. However, the Centre for Public Integrity found that a disproportionate share went to seats held by the government or those it hoped to win. The program's original design was questioned on constitutional grounds, leading to a change that channelled funds through state or local government bodies. The Senate inquiry was established to examine the scheme's integrity.

Key Perspectives

[Constitutional expert Anne Twomey]: She argues the grants system allowed political favours dressed as policy, calling it 'grey corruption'. She says the original design was constitutionally invalid and the process lacked transparency. [The Centre for Public Integrity]: Its investigation found that nearly three-quarters of the program's funding went to Labor-held or marginal seats, suggesting a political bias in allocations. [Government/Program supporters]: While no direct response from the government is included in the source material, the Prime Minister has previously defended the grant, and the program was altered to address constitutional concerns.

What to Watch

  • The Senate inquiry's final report and any recommendations for reform.
  • Whether the government tightens rules around closed, non-competitive grant programs.
  • Potential further scrutiny of other grants awarded under the same program.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.