The crypto industry's political action committees spent more than $170 million in the 2026 midterm elections, but several of their high-profile picks lost, taking a bite out of the sector's winning record from 2024.
According to tracking by Tech Influence Watch, the Fairshake network and its affiliates Defend American Jobs and Protect Progress deployed roughly $75 million supporting Republicans and $30 million backing Democrats, while spending a further $36 million opposing Democratic candidates.
Tuesday’s results took a bite out of crypto PACs’ winning record from 2024, when their spending helped elect congressional allies from both parties and defeat prominent industry critics. The industry had also faced a setback in Washington after the Senate blocked the Clarity Act in September, leaving its push for a regulatory framework for digital assets unfinished.
In Ohio, the PACs spent more than $40 million to support incumbent Republican Senator Jon Husted and $24 million to oppose Democratic challenger Sherrod Brown, a longtime industry critic. Brown won, a result that reversed the 2024 outcome when crypto money helped Republican Bernie Moreno defeat him.
Similar losses followed across the Midwest and Sun Belt. In Wisconsin, nearly $2 million backing Republican Representative Bryan Steil could not prevent a loss to Democrat Mitchell Berman. In Texas, $1.4 million supporting Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton did not stop Democrat James Talarico. In Michigan, Democrat Abdul El-Sayed overcame $810,000 in spending backing Republican Mike Rogers. And in Iowa, $700,000 from the Winklevosses' pro-crypto Digital Freedom Fund supporting Ashley Hinson did not prevent Democrat Josh Turek from winning. Illinois Democrat Juliana Stratton survived roughly $10 million in primary-season opposition spending to win her Senate seat.
The effort was not without returns. In Nebraska, over $13 million opposing independent Dan Osborn helped Republican Pete Ricketts hold his seat, preserving an ally on the Senate Banking Committee. In Kentucky, crypto PACs spent nearly $8 million backing Andy Barr in the Republican primary; Barr won the Senate seat held by retiring Mitch McConnell.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The failure to convert record-breaking spending into decisive victories suggests the crypto industry's political strategy may have reached its limits, forcing a rethink of how it approaches federal races.
- The return of longtime critic Sherrod Brown to the Senate and the defeat of several Banking Committee allies leaves the industry's push for a federal regulatory framework in a significantly weaker position than after 2024.
- Voters in competitive swing states did not appear to reward candidates backed by crypto money, indicating the issue lacked the salience to override other electoral dynamics.
Background
The article reports on the 2026 US midterm elections, where a network of crypto-focused Super PACs attempted to replicate a successful 2024 strategy of buying influence by funding pro-crypto candidates and opposing critics. The industry's legislative push had stalled months earlier when the Senate blocked the Clarity Act, a bipartisan bill designed to create a comprehensive federal framework for digital assets.
What to Watch
- Whether the industry pivots away from broad general-election spending toward more targeted primary races and lobbying as its costing strategy comes under scrutiny.
- The fate of the Clarity Act in the new Congress, where the industry has lost some of its strongest advocates and gained a revived sceptic.
- How the remaining $90 million in PAC funds is redeployed, and whether major crypto donors adjust their giving in response to the midterm results.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 10 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedCrypto PACs spent more than $170 million on the midterms.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Crypto PACs including Fairshake , Defend American Jobs, and Protect Progress spent more than $170 million of their roughly $260 million war chest on the midterms, according to Tech Influence Watch”
- SupportedSeveral high-profile crypto PAC picks lost.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The sector’s political action committees, which amassed hundreds of millions of dollars to back pro-crypto candidates nationwide, saw several high-profile picks lose”
- SupportedDemocrats won the Ohio, Wisconsin and Texas races described in the summary.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Brown’s victory marked a bitter reversal for the PACs ... Berman unseated him anyway. In Texas, the industry spent $1.4 million to back Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton and oppose Democrat James Talarico , who won the race.”
- SupportedTech Influence Watch’s tracking puts Fairshake and its affiliates’ spending at roughly $75 million supporting Republicans, about $30 million supporting Democrats and roughly $36 million opposing Democratic candidates.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Across Fairshake and its two affiliates, spending to support Republicans totaled roughly $75 million, compared with about $30 million to support Democrats. The network also spent roughly $36 million opposing Democratic candidates, including in party primaries.”
- SupportedThe Tuesday results dented the crypto PACs’ winning record from 2024.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Tuesday’s midterm results took a bite out of crypto PACs’ winning record from 2024, when their spending helped elect congressional allies from both parties and defeat prominent industry critics.”
- SupportedThe Senate blocked the Clarity Act in September, leaving the push for a digital-assets regulatory framework unfinished.Fortune | FORTUNE: “The industry was already nursing a setback in Washington after the Senate blocked the Clarity Act in September, leaving its push for a regulatory framework for digital assets unfinished.”
- SupportedIn Ohio, crypto PACs spent more than $40 million supporting Jon Husted and another $24 million opposing Sherrod Brown.Fortune | FORTUNE: “In Ohio, crypto PACs spent more than $40 million to support incumbent Republican Sen. Jon Husted and another $24 million to oppose his Democratic challenger and longtime crypto critic, Sherrod Brown.”
- SupportedSherrod Brown’s win reversed the 2024 result, when crypto money helped Bernie Moreno defeat him.Fortune | FORTUNE: “Brown’s victory marked a bitter reversal for the PACs, which in 2024 spent heavily to help Republican Bernie Moreno defeat him .”
- Partly supportedNearly $2 million was spent backing Bryan Steil in Wisconsin.Fortune | FORTUNE: “In Wisconsin, crypto groups spent nearly $2 million to support Republican incumbent Bryan Steil, chair of the House Financial Services digital assets subcommittee, and oppose Democrat Mitchell Berman, according to Tech Influence Watch.”
- Partly supportedThe industry spent $1.4 million supporting Ken Paxton in Texas.Fortune | FORTUNE: “In Texas, the industry spent $1.4 million to back Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton and oppose Democrat James Talarico , who won the race.”
- SupportedIn Nebraska, more than $13 million opposing Dan Osborn helped Pete Ricketts hold his seat and preserve an industry ally on the Senate Banking Committee.Fortune | FORTUNE: “In Nebraska, the Fairshake network spent over $13 million opposing independent Dan Osborn, helping Republican Sen. Pete Ricketts fend off an unexpectedly strong challenge, preserving an industry ally on the Senate Banking Committee.”
- SupportedCrypto PACs spent nearly $8 million backing Andy Barr in the Republican primary, and Barr won the Senate seat held by retiring Mitch McConnell.Fortune | FORTUNE: “In Kentucky, Republican Andy Barr won the Senate seat held by retiring Mitch McConnell after crypto PACs spent nearly $8 million backing him in the Republican primary, sending another industry ally to the chamber.”