Robot models that learn many skills instead of one fixed task are hard to compare: whatever makes real-world trials informative also makes them hard to repeat.
This work links many robots in different locations, run by full-time operators, into one shared testing system with identical rules and software. It compares several general models, including policies that turn camera images and instructions straight into motor commands, across several kinds of robot hardware.
In blinded head-to-head trials, general AI agents matched the specialized robot policies, though none completed open-ended tasks reliably. Rankings agreed only weakly across robot types, and skill without practice poorly predicted skill after training on demonstrations, so no single leaderboard tells the whole story.
