Families urge ban on Oxevision cameras in England's mental health wards

Lawyers tell Lampard inquiry that the monitoring system has been used as a substitute for in-person care

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Families bereaved by deaths on English mental health wards have called on an inquiry to ban Oxevision, an infrared camera monitoring system used in half of the country's mental health wards, saying patients' lives are at stake while it remains in use.

Families bereaved by deaths on English mental health wards have called for Oxevision, an infrared camera monitoring system used in half of the country's mental health wards, to be banned, telling an inquiry that patients' lives are at stake.

The Lampard inquiry into mental health deaths in Essex heard on Tuesday that five patients killed themselves, or died unexpectedly, over two years while being monitored by the system at Essex Partnership University NHS foundation trust.

Peter Mant KC, who represents more than 70 bereaved families, including the family of Elise Sebastian, 16, who killed herself in 2021 after staff muted Oxevision's alarm system, said the technology had contributed in material ways to harms and, in some cases, deaths of patients, due to its misapplication.

Mant told the inquiry the remote system had far too often been used as a substitute for in-person observations, causing missed opportunities for therapeutic engagement that expert witnesses regard as critical to treatment and recovery. He said claims made for the system's effectiveness by Lio, its Oxford-based manufacturer, rested on nothing more than unverified anecdote, and that the inquiry's own statisticians found no evidence to support its effectiveness. He urged the inquiry chair, Kate Lampard, to issue interim recommendations for mandatory life-saving training for all mental health staff and for the suspension of Oxevision, to reduce the risk of further avoidable deaths.

Brenda Campbell KC, representing families including that of Sophie Alderman, who mistakenly believed in 2022 that Oxevision would bring staff to save her, said the system's harms had fallen hardest on detained, traumatised and neurodivergent patients, and that no regulator had taken responsibility for it. She described a camera in a bedroom as a significant invasion of privacy, affording patients no sanctuary and no means of knowing when they were being watched, and cited evidence that the devices can increase paranoia and prompt some patients to scream at them. Addressing Lampard, she said the residual claims of limited clinical benefit for Oxevision did not outweigh the significant harm to patient safety, autonomy and privacy.

Lady Lampard is considering whether to issue interim regulations, including over the use of Oxevision, if she considers action necessary to prevent more deaths. The inquiry, which began in 2024, is examining more than 2,000 mental health deaths in Essex over a 23-year period. The Information Commissioner's Office opened a separate inquiry into the technology earlier this year over data protection concerns.

Giving evidence last week, Laura Cozens, head of patient safety at Lio, said it was important to consider the benefits the technology could offer mental health patients. She said: "The evidence that we have heard shouldn't be interpreted as the Oxevision system being ineffective, or unsafe or of no benefit … The technology has assisted staff in intervening in critical safety incidents."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The inquiry chair is weighing interim regulations that could halt or restrict a monitoring system deployed across half of England's mental health wards.
  • The case tests whether surveillance technology is being used as a substitute for human contact in the care of vulnerable, detained patients.
  • The outcome could shape how similar hospital monitoring products, and the safety claims of their manufacturers, are assessed in the NHS.

Background

The Lampard inquiry, chaired by Kate Lampard, began in 2024 and is investigating more than 2,000 mental health deaths in Essex over a 23-year period. Oxevision, made by Oxford-based Lio, uses infrared cameras to monitor patients in hospital rooms and alerts staff to safety incidents. The families' case follows evidence that five patients died over two years while the system was in use at Essex Partnership University NHS foundation trust. Separately, the Information Commissioner's Office has opened an inquiry into the technology over data protection concerns.

Key Perspectives

Bereaved families and their counsel: The technology has contributed to patient harms and deaths, substitutes for in-person observation, and leaves patients with no sanctuary and no means of knowing when they are being watched. They want its use stopped nationally. Lio, the manufacturer: The system offers benefits to mental health patients, and the evidence heard should not be read as showing it is ineffective, unsafe or without benefit. Laura Cozens told the inquiry the technology has helped staff intervene in critical safety incidents. The inquiry: Kate Lampard is considering whether to issue interim regulations covering Oxevision if she judges action necessary to prevent further deaths.

What to Watch

  • Whether Lady Lampard releases interim recommendations to suspend Oxevision and require life-saving training for all mental health staff.
  • The outcome of the Information Commissioner's separate investigation into data protection concerns.
  • Whether the inquiry links specific patient deaths, including those of Elise Sebastian and Sophie Alderman, to the way the system was used.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedFamilies are urging the inquiry to ban Oxevision in England’s mental health wards.World news | The Guardian: “Ban ‘intrusive’ cameras in England’s mental health wards, say bereaved families. Families bereaved by the misuse of an “intrusive” camera monitoring system for vulnerable patients used in half of England’s mental health wards have called for it to be banned”
  2. Partly supportedFamilies say patients’ lives are at stake while Oxevision remains in use.World news | The Guardian: “Lawyers for the families said “patients’ lives are at stake” by the continuing use of Oxevision”
  3. SupportedOxevision is an infrared camera system used in half of England’s mental health wards.World news | The Guardian: “Families bereaved by the misuse of an “intrusive” camera monitoring system for vulnerable patients used in half of England’s mental health wards”
  4. SupportedThe inquiry heard that five patients died by suicide or unexpectedly over two years while monitored by Oxevision at Essex Partnership University NHS foundation trust.World news | The Guardian: “The inquiry was told that five patients killed themselves, or died unexpectedly, in two years while being surveilled by Oxevision’s infrared cameras at Essex Partnership University NHS foundation trust.”
  5. SupportedPeter Mant KC represents more than 70 bereaved families, including Elise Sebastian’s family; Elise was 16 and died by suicide in 2021 when staff had muted Oxevision’s alarm.World news | The Guardian: “Peter Mant KC, representing more than 70 bereaved families, including the family of Elise Sebastian, 16, who killed herself in 2021 when staff had muted Oxevision’s alarm system”
  6. SupportedMant said Oxevision had contributed to harms and, in some cases, deaths because of its misapplication.World news | The Guardian: ““Use of this technology has contributed in material ways to harms, and in some cases deaths of patients, due to the misapplication of the system.””
  7. SupportedMant said Oxevision had too often been used instead of in-person observations, resulting in missed therapeutic engagement opportunities that experts consider critical to treatment and recovery.World news | The Guardian: ““It has far too often been used as a substitute for in-person observations.” Citing evidence from expert witnesses to the inquiry, he said this had led to “missed opportunities for therapeutic engagement between staff and their patients … in circumstances where therapeutic engagement is something that your experts agree is absolutely critical to treatment and recovery.””
  8. SupportedMant said Lio’s claims about Oxevision’s effectiveness were based on unverified anecdote, and the inquiry’s statisticians found no evidence supporting its effectiveness.World news | The Guardian: “Mant said claims made for the effectiveness of Oxevision by Lio, its Oxford-based manufacturer, were based on “nothing more than unverified anecdote”. The inquiry’s own statisticians found no evidence to support its effectiveness, he added.”
  9. SupportedMant urged interim recommendations for mandatory life-saving training for mental health staff and suspension of Oxevision to reduce the risk of further harm and avoidable deaths.World news | The Guardian: “He urged Lampard to issue interim recommendations for mandatory life-saving training for all mental health staff and the suspension of Oxevision. “My clients ask you to make those recommendations now to reduce the risk that other patients will suffer harm and that other families will lose loved ones to avoidable deaths.””
  10. SupportedCampbell said Sophie Alderman mistakenly believed in 2022 that Oxevision would bring staff to save her.World news | The Guardian: “Campbell, who is representing other bereaved families, including that of Sophie Alderman who the inquiry heard mistakenly believed in 2022 that Oxevision would bring staff to save her”
  11. SupportedCampbell said the harms fell hardest on detained, traumatised and neurodivergent patients, and that no regulator took responsibility for Oxevision.World news | The Guardian: ““Its harms have fallen hardest on detained, traumatised and neurodivergent patients, and no regulator took responsibility for it.””
  12. SupportedCozens said the evidence should not be taken to mean Oxevision was ineffective, unsafe or of no benefit, and that it had helped staff intervene in critical safety incidents.World news | The Guardian: ““The evidence that we have heard shouldn’t be interpreted as the Oxevision system being ineffective, or unsafe or of no benefit … The technology has assisted staff in intervening in critical safety incidents.””

Zotpaper

Written by June Katz on the Science desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub. Plate by Ollie Flash, picture desk.

1 source11 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe