Firmus Technologies slashes valuation ahead of ASX debut amid investor scepticism

AI datacentre company may shelve what was billed as Australia's largest IPO in decades

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
AI datacentre company Firmus Technologies is sharply cutting its near-$44bn valuation or may shelve its initial public offering entirely, multiple sources briefed on the matter have told Guardian Australia, just weeks out from its anticipated ASX listing.

The momentum behind Firmus Technologies' high-flying valuation is showing severe cracks. Sources say the company is slashing its price to entice sceptical investors, with discussions underway to save what was billed as the largest IPO in Australia in decades.

On Thursday, Firmus abruptly withdrew from its scheduled appearance at a parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence amid the harried negotiations.

The alarm bells have centred on a near-$44bn valuation for a company still in its start-up phase. Just over a year ago, Firmus was worth less than $2bn, according to the value placed on it by Nvidia and others as they took equity stakes. Successive capital raising by many of the same core investors drove the valuation from $1.85bn to $15bn about eight weeks ago, then to almost $44bn days ago. But that figure is now being heavily unwound due to tepid support.

"The whole thing was getting fanciful," one investment manager briefed on the float said. "It's a business that's losing hundreds of millions of dollars, and yet its valuation kept going up nonstop every couple of months."

Firmus has raised money from Nvidia, Blackstone, Jane Street and Coatue. It aims to cash in on surging AI expenditure by building and operating liquid-cooled "AI factories" packed with Nvidia GPUs.

However, the company only has two small operational sites alongside seven contracted and four planned facilities. About 97% of contracted revenue sits on sites that aren't yet built, according to Minotaur Capital co-founder Armina Rosenberg.

"You only get near the offer price if delivery, financing and renewals all go to plan," Rosenberg said.

Firmus's high valuation relies on prompt construction of that unbuilt pipeline at a time when local communities in Australia and the US are rebelling against similar developments. While Firmus's focus on Asia avoids some backlash, it faces power constraints and construction delays.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The potential collapse of what was billed as Australia's largest IPO in decades would signal a cooling of investor appetite for AI infrastructure plays, affecting the broader IPO market.
  • Firmus's valuation trajectory – from less than $2bn to nearly $44bn and back down – illustrates the gap between AI hype and financial fundamentals.
  • If the IPO is shelved, it may raise questions about the viability of other datacentre companies relying on unbuilt pipelines and future contracts.

Background

Firmus Technologies is an AI datacentre company that builds and operates liquid-cooled facilities packed with Nvidia graphics processing units. It has positioned itself to capitalise on surging AI expenditure by offering what it calls "AI factories." The company had been preparing for a listing on the Australian Securities Exchange, with backing from major investors including chip maker Nvidia and Wall Street firms Blackstone, Jane Street and Coatue. The IPO was promoted as a flagship float for the ASX, attracting scrutiny over its valuation relative to its operational scale.

Key Perspectives

[Investors and analysts]: Many are sceptical of the near-$44bn valuation for a company with only two operational sites and hundreds of millions in losses. The valuation relied on future revenue from unbuilt facilities, which one investment manager called "fanciful." [Firmus and its backers]: The company has contracts with Meta, OpenAI and Nvidia, and argues that its focus on Asian markets avoids the community backlash plaguing datacentre developments in Australia and the US. Its backers were confident of the high valuation days ago but are now re-pricing. [Critics]: Minotaur Capital's Armina Rosenberg notes that 97% of contracted revenue depends on sites not yet built, and that reaching the offer price requires delivery, financing and renewals to all go to plan. Local community opposition and power constraints add further risk.

What to Watch

  • Whether Firmus proceeds with its IPO later this month at a substantially reduced valuation or shelves it entirely.
  • The final pricing that investors accept, which will serve as a benchmark for other AI infrastructure companies looking to list.
  • Any developments in the parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence, from which Firmus abruptly withdrew.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.