HSBC's comments come ahead of Wednesday's budget, in which chancellor John Healey is expected to reverse previous Conservative government cuts to the bank surcharge. Lobby groups have warned for months that higher tax bills could drive big banks' business and jobs to rival hubs. Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JP Morgan, has said he could scrap plans for a new £3bn London headquarters if Britain became “hostile” to banks, and a small number of wealthy businesspeople have already said they are leaving the UK, some criticising Labour's tax policies.
Kaur said there was “no pressure”, particularly from shareholders in its cornerstone Hong Kong market, to shift out of London. She gave broad backing to Healey and prime minister Andy Burnham, saying the bank was “very encouraged by the government's growth agenda” and would “just have to see how businesses and customers react”. “Irrespective of what happens on taxes, we are there to support our customers, and that is what we will do,” she told journalists on a media call on Tuesday.
HSBC's third-quarter profit was boosted by higher interest rates, lower loan losses and smaller legal provisions. Net interest income rose to $9.3bn from $8.8bn a year earlier, which the bank attributed to hedging strategies and deposit growth in Hong Kong, with UK deposits flat. Despite the results, HSBC's UK-listed shares fell almost 6% on Tuesday morning, threatening its status as the biggest company on the FTSE 100. Kaur suggested investors may have expected stronger forecasts for net interest income.
The profit figure drew criticism. Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said the results showed banks could comfortably shoulder higher taxes, making it “blatantly obvious banks can afford to contribute more”. Abhijay Sood, an economist at the New Economics Foundation thinktank, said the profits would be “difficult news to swallow for households struggling with rising mortgage costs”. He argued that big banks' profitability had depended on keeping savings rates low and on a “stealth subsidy” from taxpayers via the Bank of England's quantitative easing, and said the rumoured bank tax change was “unlikely to go far enough”.
