Louise Haigh, the de facto deputy prime minister, is expected to approve a reduction of about a quarter to the UK’s interim 2030 electric vehicle sales target this week, following a crunch Downing Street meeting. The move is expected to relieve carmakers who say current targets are unattainable, but risks a confrontation with environmental campaigners and Labour MPs concerned about the government’s climate agenda.
Government insiders say Haigh will probably sign off on a 2030 target of about 60%, while extending the flexibilities available to carmakers until 2034. She is understood to have told colleagues she does not want them to come back in the future demanding another target reduction.
The current mandate was introduced under the previous Conservative government, requiring carmakers to make sure they only sell electric vehicles by 2035, with an interim target of 80% by 2030. The policy is the government’s single biggest decarbonisation measure, but carmakers have long argued the interim targets are unattainable due to higher inflation and a squeeze on living standards. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said battery electric vehicles made up 26.6% of new car sales in the first 10 months of this year, against this year’s 33% target. The consultation has kickstarted an internal battle in government: Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has argued for a cut to 50%, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is believed to want around 60%, and Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh and her predecessor Ed Miliband are understood to want to keep the 80% target. Prime Minister Andy Burnham recused himself from the decision because his wife advises a charging network.
Lizzi Collinge, the Labour MP for Morecambe and Lunesdale, said: “The upcoming decision on the ZEV mandate will have a huge climate impact, possibly the biggest one that’s on the PM’s desk.” Catherine Fookes, the MP for Monmouthshire, said: “The government has some incredibly difficult decisions to make in the coming months and the prime minister will need to weigh up the consequences of each. We need the ZEV mandate to stay, and Rosebank to be rejected.” The industry body ChargeUK warned that weakening the mandate puts £1.7 billion of charging infrastructure at risk. Its chief executive, Shane Brennan, said: “Charging investors’ confidence will be rocked by a third change in three years. Government should be in no way complacent about the long-term implications of being seen to cave to the short-term interest of global car importers.” Mike Hawes, the chief executive of the SMMT, said: “The gap between demand and mandated targets continues to widen. Meaningful change to the trajectory, alongside expanded flexibilities throughout the regulation, is essential to bridge that gap, safeguard jobs and investment while keeping the UK’s zero emission transition on track.” Paul McNamee of the Labour Climate and Environment Forum said significant weakening would be seen as “a rowing back on climate leadership”.
A government spokesperson said: “The government is united in its commitment to the ZEV mandate and no decisions have been taken. We are committed to the phaseout of all new cars relying solely on petrol and diesel engines by 2030, and to 100% of new car and van sales being zero emission by 2035, and our legally binding net zero targets. Our consultation on the mandate will not change this, and will ensure we are taking a pragmatic and balanced approach to the ZEV transition.”
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The UK's ZEV mandate is its single biggest decarbonisation policy. Weakening it puts the government's legally binding net zero targets at risk.
- A cut threatens £1.7 billion in charging infrastructure investment and the jobs and supply chain that depend on it.
- The decision tests the new Burnham government's commitment to its green agenda following other controversial decisions on fossil fuels and defence spending.
Background
The UK's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate was established under the previous Conservative government, requiring carmakers to phase out the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2035. The policy includes interim targets, such as 80% of sales being zero emission by 2030. Carmakers have consistently argued that these interim targets are unattainable due to economic pressures on consumers. The government launched a consultation in August offering five options for altering the trajectory, leading to an internal battle between business, transport and energy departments.
Key Perspectives
- Government (spokesperson): No decisions have been taken; the government remains committed to the ZEV mandate and the 2030 and 2035 phaseout targets.
- Carmakers (SMMT): The targets are unattainable, and meaningful changes to the trajectory are needed to bridge the gap between demand and mandates, safeguarding jobs and investment.
- Labour MPs (Lizzi Collinge, Catherine Fookes): The mandate has a huge climate impact and must stay; the prime minister must weigh up the consequences of weakening it.
- Charging Industry (ChargeUK): Weakening the mandate puts £1.7bn of charging infrastructure at risk and will rock investor confidence.
- Labour Climate and Environment Forum: A significant weakening will be seen as a rowing back on climate leadership.
What to Watch
- The outcome of the Downing Street meeting on Wednesday and the final target percentage Louise Haigh agrees to.
- Whether the government provides a binding assurance that the mandate will not be weakened again.
- The decisions on the Rosebank oilfield, which Labour MPs are closely linking to the EV mandate as a test of the government's climate credibility.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedThe headline says the Labour government is expected to cut electric vehicle targets.UK news | The Guardian: “Ministers are expected to make steep cuts to the government’s electric vehicle (EV) targets this week”
- SupportedThe move is expected to relieve carmakers but alarm climate campaigners and some Labour MPs.UK news | The Guardian: “in a move that will relieve carmakers but alarm many Labour MPs who are worried about the government’s commitment to the green agenda.”
- Partly supportedHaigh is expected to approve a reduction of about a quarter this week, following a crunch Downing Street meeting.UK news | The Guardian: “Haigh will finalise the plan after a crunch meeting in Downing Street on Wednesday”
- SupportedGovernment insiders say Haigh will probably sign off on a 2030 target of about 60% and extend flexibilities until 2034.UK news | The Guardian: “Government insiders say Haigh will probably sign off on a 2030 target of about 60%, while also extending the flexibilities in the targets until 2034.”
- SupportedHaigh told colleagues she does not want them to seek another target reduction in the future.UK news | The Guardian: “She is understood to have told colleagues, however, that she does not want them to come back in the future demanding another target reduction.”
- SupportedThe current mandate requires carmakers to sell only electric vehicles by 2035, with an interim target of 80% by 2030.UK news | The Guardian: “carmakers have to make sure they only sell EVs by 2035, gradually increasing the proportion over time to 80% by 2030.”
- SupportedBattery electric vehicles made up 26.6% of new car sales in the first 10 months of the year, against a 33% target.UK news | The Guardian: “with battery EVs accounting for 26.6% of new car sales in the first 10 months of the year.”
- SupportedReynolds argued for a 50% target, Alexander was believed to want about 60%, and Fahnbulleh and Miliband were understood to want 80%.UK news | The Guardian: “Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, has argued for the 2030 target to be reduced as far as possible, to 50%. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, is believed to want it to be approximately 60%, while Miatta Fahnbulleh and her predecessor as energy secretary, Ed Miliband, are understood to want it to remain at 80%.”
- SupportedCollinge said the decision would have a huge climate impact, possibly the biggest one on the PM’s desk.UK news | The Guardian: “The upcoming decision on the ZEV [zero emission vehicle] mandate will have a huge climate impact, possibly the biggest one that’s on the PM’s desk.”
- SupportedFookes said the government had difficult decisions ahead, the ZEV mandate should stay, and Rosebank should be rejected.UK news | The Guardian: “The government has some incredibly difficult decisions to make in the coming months and the prime minister will need to weigh up the consequences of each. We need the ZEV mandate to stay, and Rosebank to be rejected.”
- SupportedChargeUK’s CEO said weakening the mandate puts £1.7 billion of charging infrastructure at risk.UK news | The Guardian: “Weakening the mandate puts £1.7bn of charging infrastructure at risk”
- SupportedThe government spokesperson said no decisions had been taken and repeated commitments to the 2030 and 2035 phaseout and zero-emission sales goals.UK news | The Guardian: “The government is united in its commitment to the ZEV mandate and no decisions have been taken. We are committed to the phaseout of all new cars relying solely on petrol and diesel engines by 2030, and to 100% of new car and van sales being zero emission by 2035”