Labour’s water consumer panels a ‘stitch-up’, campaigners say, as firms advised on design

The Consumer Council for Water (CCW) is creating what the government described as “powerful consumer panels” that would allow the public to question executives of their local water company and seek redress for problems with sewage and water services in England and Wales.

However, exclusive documents seen by the Guardian show that water companies were permitted to advise on how they wish to be held to account under the new system. Campaigners have criticised the arrangement, arguing it undermines the independence of the panels and amounts to allowing the industry to write its own rules.

The government has not yet responded to the criticism. The CCW is expected to roll out the panels in the coming months.

Why This Matters

The panels are meant to give ordinary customers a direct voice and a path to compensation, but the involvement of water companies in their design raises questions about effectiveness.
The controversy comes amid ongoing public anger over sewage discharges and rising water bills, making trust in regulatory oversight a key issue.
If the panels are seen as toothless, Labour could face renewed pressure to take stronger action against the water industry.

Background

Water companies in England and Wales have faced widespread criticism over repeated sewage spills, high executive pay, and rising customer bills. Labour, which came to power promising to clean up the water industry, proposed the consumer panels as a way to increase accountability without full renationalisation. The Consumer Council for Water (CCW) is the statutory consumer body for the sector.

Key Perspectives

Campaigners: Argue that allowing water firms to advise on the design of the panels is a “stitch-up” that undermines their independence and leaves customers with a weak accountability mechanism. Water companies: Their involvement in the design process suggests they sought to shape the rules to their advantage, though the companies themselves have not commented publicly on the leaked documents. Critics and sceptics: Question whether the panels will have real power to enforce change or will simply serve as a public relations exercise.

What to Watch

The specific terms of reference and powers granted to the panels when they are formally launched.
Any further leaks or documents revealing the extent of industry influence over the CCW’s process.
Public and parliamentary reaction if the panels are perceived as insufficiently independent.

ZOTPAPER