Many language models need enormous amounts of natural text to train. Some researchers try to jump-start learning using synthetic data like code or artificial languages before natural language training. This "pre-pretraining" (PPT) aims to give models useful skills more efficiently.
The authors tested PPT against standard training on natural language alone across four synthetic data types. They carefully matched computation in each comparison and checked if reported gains depended on how model weights were initially set.
Under fair comparison, PPT never beat pure natural-language training. The best improvement was 5.4% in perplexity under a specific setup, but this advantage disappeared at 1 billion tokens of natural language. Models also forgot synthetic skills when switching to real text, so synthetic pre-training is not worthwhile for language models.
