, or RLVR, trains language models by giving a yes/no signal for correct answers. A central debate asks whether this actually teaches new reasoning strategies or just polishes skills the model already has.
This paper explains the conflict by identifying "primacy bias": a tendency for the model to over-rely on its initial training and stay rigid, or "lazy". Experiments confirm RLVR mostly improves performance on easy problems while failing to adapt to harder ones.
Hard problems are the only ones that genuinely expand reasoning. However, training on them causes of easy skills. This reconciles prior findings where RLVR helped more on unfamiliar domains than on well-practiced math tasks.
