Malta warned of corruption crisis after Daphne Caruana Galizia verdict

Council of Europe inquiry opens as Labour peer says failure to protect journalists puts rule of law at risk

edit
By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
A Council of Europe inquiry into the judicial aftermath of Daphne Caruana Galizia's assassination has opened with a warning from Labour peer Shami Chakrabarti that Malta remains vulnerable to repeated instances of high-level corruption unless it strengthens the rule of law and protections for journalists.

Chakrabarti, a member of the House of Lords and former director of the human rights group Liberty, has been named special rapporteur for the investigation by the Council of Europe into the fallout from the murder of the anti-corruption journalist, who died in a car bombing in October 2017.

Speaking at the opening of the inquiry, Chakrabarti said the failure to implement legal protections was still putting journalists at risk and sending a 'chill down the spine'. The peer's remarks come after a verdict in the case that has prompted fresh concerns about the state of justice in Malta.

The inquiry is expected to examine whether the Maltese legal system has adequately addressed the failures that allowed the assassination to occur and whether reforms have been sufficient to prevent future abuses.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The inquiry directly addresses the safety of journalists across Europe; if Malta is found wanting, other states could face similar scrutiny.
  • Weak rule of law in an EU member state undermines trust in the bloc's anti-corruption mechanisms.
  • The outcome could pressure Malta to adopt stronger legal protections for whistleblowers and investigative reporters.

Background

Daphne Caruana Galizia was a prominent Maltese journalist who exposed corruption at the highest levels of government. She was killed by a car bomb in 2017. Three men were convicted of carrying out the murder, but questions remain about who ordered the killing and whether state institutions have been sufficiently reformed to prevent future attacks. The Council of Europe, a human rights body distinct from the EU, has launched this inquiry as part of ongoing efforts to uphold democratic standards among its member states.

Key Perspectives

Council of Europe / Human Rights Advocates: They argue that without robust legal protections and independent oversight, journalists remain at risk and corruption goes unchecked. Maltese Government: The government has previously stated it has taken steps to reform the judiciary and press protections, but critics say these measures are insufficient. Journalist Safety Groups: They warn that the chilling effect on investigative journalism is already visible, with fewer reporters willing to pursue sensitive stories.

What to Watch

  • The findings of the Council of Europe's investigation and any recommendations it issues.
  • Whether Malta enacts specific new laws to protect journalists and witnesses.
  • The response from the European Commission, which has previously raised concerns about rule of law in Malta.

Sources

newspaper

Zotpaper

Articles published under the Zotpaper byline are synthesized from multiple source publications by our AI editor and reviewed by our editorial process. Each story combines reporting from credible outlets to give readers a balanced, comprehensive view.