Military families face year-end eviction as Victoria Barracks sale spurs rally

Former prime minister John Howard to address Moore Park protest against plan to sell historic Sydney site

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time4 min
Military families face eviction from Sydney's historic Victoria Barracks by the end of the year as the federal government presses ahead with plans to sell the site, prompting a cross-party alliance of politicians, business leaders and military figures to rally in opposition on Sunday.

Military families face being moved out of Victoria Barracks in Paddington before alternative accommodation is secured, critics say, as the federal government pursues the sale of the 178-year-old site. Former prime minister John Howard will speak at a rally on Sunday, organised by the Save Victoria Barracks Alliance, which has been moved from the barracks gates to Moore Park near Kippax Lake on police advice about expected crowd size.

Howard said he would demonstrate the "depths of community resentment" over the proposal. "Like many in the community I resent the Albanese government's indifference to our proud national and military history in proposing the sale of sites which are part of that history," he said in a statement.

The barracks is one of 67 Defence properties earmarked for full or partial sale after an independent review of ageing and underused military assets, part of a program aiming to raise up to $3 billion for other Defence priorities. As of December 2025, up to 250 permanent Australian Defence Force personnel were based there, along with 50 to 100 public servants, 150 to 200 reservists and 50 to 100 cadets. The site houses Headquarters Forces Command, the 2nd Health Brigade, a museum, cadet training and residential accommodation.

Critics warn plans to relocate up to 12 families, including children, are being rushed. Defence has proposed moving administrative staff to Defence Plaza Sydney, about two kilometres away, and cadets to Randwick Barracks or community facilities, but has not publicly detailed where every operational unit or military household would go.

The timetable has shifted. A September planning order requiring personnel to leave by December 19 was rescinded after the department said it had been "erroneously" issued. Defence later said relocations would begin in the fourth quarter of the year and that no final decisions had been made. A Defence spokesperson said consultation had begun, with most personnel expected to move off-site before the end of 2026, and the transition "will be managed carefully and sensitively, supporting our people, families and the broader Defence community while preserving its heritage, history and legacy".

Defence Minister Richard Marles has signalled he wants to move quickly, saying last month he expected Defence to leave the affected sites "as soon as possible". Liberal senator Jess Collins, chairing a Senate inquiry into the sales, said serving personnel have been silenced. "The army has been gagged. The Defence Force cannot speak up about it," she said.

RSL NSW president Vince Williams, a retired vice-admiral, criticised the rush. "It's appalling, kicking people out in a hurry and sticking them into an office tower in Pitt Street, or into bunk beds in Randwick Barracks without having replacement full-time accommodation sorted out beforehand," he said. "It's the message it's sending that is terrible for morale."

The financial case has also drawn scrutiny. Defence has declined to disclose expected proceeds, telling the inquiry that releasing figures could "diminish" the Commonwealth's negotiating position. The Department of Finance reported $2.72 million spent on external advisers to August 31, including $1.66 million in fees paid to KPMG.

The alliance has attracted support across party lines, including NSW Labor MP Marjorie O'Neill, who has called the barracks the army's "spiritual home", independent federal MP Allegra Spender, and former Wallabies captain Simon Poidevin, whose grandfather served there in World War I. "They've got kids and families, they're active members of surf clubs and sporting groups and they're now asking where will they go," Poidevin said. Spender said the site should remain in public hands: "This is not something that needs to be turned into a boutique hotel or a wedding venue."

The rally follows a separate protest this month over the partial sale of HMAS Penguin at Balmoral, where hundreds turned out in opposition.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Up to 12 military families, including children, could be relocated before replacement housing is secured, a test of how Defence treats serving personnel during the divestment program.
  • The sale is a test case for a wider program covering 67 Defence properties, with proceeds of up to $3 billion earmarked for other Defence priorities.
  • The involvement of a former prime minister and a cross-party alliance signals the political risk of selling heritage military land in a city electorate.

Background

Victoria Barracks has been an operational military site for 178 years, housing major command headquarters along with a museum, cadet training and family accommodation. The proposed sale follows an independent review of ageing and underused Defence assets. The government argues the proceeds will fund other Defence priorities, while opponents say the public case for the sale has not been made and that heritage and morale costs are being rushed.

Key Perspectives

The federal government and Defence: The divestment will free funds for Defence priorities. Defence says the transition will be managed carefully, consultation is under way, and most personnel will move off-site by the end of 2026. Marles wants sites vacated "as soon as possible".

The Save Victoria Barracks Alliance: RSL NSW, former prime minister John Howard, state and federal MPs, business and sporting figures argue the barracks remains operational and central to Army identity, and that families should not be moved without accommodation secured.

Critics of the process: Senator Jess Collins says serving personnel have been gagged. The recall of the December eviction order has added to uncertainty, and the refusal to disclose expected proceeds, alongside $2.72 million in adviser fees including $1.66 million to KPMG, has raised questions about the financial case.

What to Watch

  • The size of Sunday's rally at Moore Park and whether it shifts the government's position.
  • The Senate inquiry's findings and any disclosure of the expected sale proceeds.
  • Whether relocation of military families proceeds in the fourth quarter with confirmed housing in place.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedMilitary families face eviction from Victoria Barracks by the end of the year.The Age - Latest News: “Military families face being evicted from Sydney’s historic Victoria Barracks by the end of the year”
  2. SupportedThe proposed sale has prompted a rally in opposition.The Age - Latest News: “the Save Victoria Barracks Alliance, which will hold a public rally on Sunday urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to keep the site in public hands”
  3. SupportedFormer prime minister John Howard will address the Moore Park protest on Sunday.The Age - Latest News: “Former prime minister John Howard said he would speak at the rally on Sunday”
  4. SupportedThe sale plans prompted a cross-party alliance to rally in opposition on Sunday.The Age - Latest News: “The concerns have united a group of politicians, business leaders, sporting identities and senior military figures under the Save Victoria Barracks Alliance, which will hold a public rally on Sunday”
  5. SupportedHoward said he would demonstrate the “depths of community resentment” over the proposal.The Age - Latest News: “Former prime minister John Howard said he would speak at the rally on Sunday to demonstrate the “depths of community resentment” over the proposal.”
  6. SupportedVictoria Barracks is among 67 Defence properties earmarked for full or partial sale.The Age - Latest News: “include Victoria Barracks among 67 Defence properties earmarked for full or partial sale”
  7. SupportedThe sale program aims to raise up to $3 billion for other Defence priorities.The Age - Latest News: “The program aims to raise up to $3 billion for other Defence priorities.”
  8. SupportedCritics say plans to relocate up to 12 families, including children, are being rushed.The Age - Latest News: “Critics of the proposed sale warn plans to relocate up to 12 families, including children, are being rushed”
  9. SupportedA September order requiring personnel to leave by December 19 was rescinded after Defence said it had been erroneously issued.The Age - Latest News: “In September, a Defence planning order requiring personnel to leave by December 19 was rescinded, with the department describing it as having been “erroneously” issued”
  10. SupportedCollins said, “The army has been gagged. The Defence Force cannot speak up about it.”The Age - Latest News: ““The army has been gagged. The Defence Force cannot speak up about it,” Collins said.”
  11. SupportedThe Department of Finance reported $2.72 million spent on external advisers, including $1.66 million in KPMG fees, as of August 31.The Age - Latest News: “spending on external advisers had totalled $2.72 million as of August 31, including $1.66m in management fees paid to KPMG”
  12. Partly supportedSpender said the site should remain in public hands.The Age - Latest News: “Independent federal MP for Wentworth Allegra Spender said community sentiment favoured retaining the site in public hands.”

Zotpaper

Written by Rex Doyle on the Australia & local desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source11 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe