New Zealand approves Danish counter-drone system as stepping stone to shooting down drones

Cabinet papers show $2m jammer is an interim fix, with legislation changes and a $17m industry accelerator to follow

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
The New Zealand Defence Force has taken a "stepping stone" step toward being able to shoot down drones, newly released Cabinet papers show, approving a Danish-made jamming system as an interim capability while it works through legal changes and builds a local industry.

New Zealand has taken a "stepping stone" towards fielding counter-drone systems that can shoot drones down, with newly released Cabinet papers confirming the Defence Force's approval of a foreign-made jamming system as an interim capability.

The papers, from July, do not name the system and blank out costs, but a $2 million deal for a Danish system already used by Australia was announced last month. The Danish firm MyDefence markets jammers that disrupt radio and GPS links, including a wearable jammer called "pitbull" and a perimeter detection unit called "wolfpack".

The Cabinet paper said the system would cope with the most likely short-term drone threat, but would not provide full protection against the advanced, high-intensity drone threats seen in the Ukraine-Russia or Middle East wars. "However, it does establish a critical foundation for future capability development, including potential expansion to systems that physically destroy drones with projectiles," it said.

Even this limited system faced legislative barriers. "Inter-agency co-ordination and amendment to legislation will be required to clarify and broaden the legal authority to use," the paper said. The legislative implications were blanked out. The system was the fourth strongest of five options, with the fifth, "maximum protection supporting larger, more complex" operations, ruled out for reasons that were also blanked. One section said it was not intended for use within New Zealand except to support national security objectives, while another discussed domestic deployment.

The paper said it would provide "sufficient protection" for the army and air force, including for RNZAF aircraft and personnel at air bases when deployed overseas on operations. Navy protection would come later because it was more complex.

The decision follows Australia's selection of counter-drone capabilities in November 2025, in which NZDF took part, and a canvass of 46 companies including 17 with facilities in New Zealand. "Analysis shows that no domestic manufacturer currently meets NZDF's immediate counter-drone needs," the Cabinet paper said. Global spending on counter-drone systems reached almost $100 billion in the first nine months of this year.

A separate November 2025 Cabinet paper, also just released, establishes a Defence Technology Accelerator that will "start small" by focusing on drones and counter-drones, with about $1 million a year for a co-development fund. Its goal is to help develop advanced technologies for military use with the NZDF and for export by late 2026. The accelerator was being set up in August, tightly partnered with the Defence Science and Technology unit in Auckland, under a four-phase plan needing additional funding for the next three phases. The paper said businesses would need help understanding export controls, international obligations, policy on autonomous weapon systems, and New Zealand's membership of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Some defence commentators have expressed disappointment at the accelerator's $17 million over four years, compared with a "significant uplift" of $100 million to $300 million flagged last year. The Cabinet paper described a "minimum viable approach" with eight staff. Then defence minister Judith Collins wrote: "This reduces risk that scarce fiscal resources are wasted."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Defence Force has acknowledged a capability gap: it can handle the most likely near-term drone threat but not the high-intensity attacks seen in Ukraine and the Middle East. The purchase is explicitly a foundation, not a fix.
  • The legal framework is not ready. Legislation must be amended to clarify and broaden the authority to use counter-drone systems, and the papers show unresolved questions about domestic deployment.
  • The Technology Accelerator is an attempt to turn defence procurement into local industry and exports, but its funding is modest relative to earlier ambitions.

Background

Drone warfare has become a defining feature of recent conflicts, with cheap aircraft used for surveillance and strikes at scale, producing a global market for counter-drone gear ranging from radio jammers to projectile interceptors. New Zealand, which has a small defence force, has been looking to allies such as Australia and the United States for capability and technology while trying to build its own industrial base through the new accelerator.

Key Perspectives

Government and NZDF: Buying a proven foreign system now is the pragmatic response to an immediate capability gap. The chosen system is interoperable with Australia and partners, and the paper argues the current threat environment requires immediate acquisition rather than waiting for local development. Local technology industry: New Zealand firms have "promising" developments but none can yet meet NZDF's needs. The accelerator offers real-world military input, shared production facilities and a path to exports, though at a deliberately small scale. Critics and sceptics: Some defence commentators are disappointed by the $17m allocated to the accelerator, well short of the $100m to $300m "significant uplift" flagged previously. There are also unresolved questions over legislation and domestic deployment, and the step-by-step approach means full protection from sophisticated drones remains a long way off.

What to Watch

  • Amendments to legislation that would broaden legal authority to use counter-drone systems, and how domestic deployment is treated.
  • Whether the Technology Accelerator's later phases receive additional funding beyond its initial $1m a year.
  • NZDF's progress toward systems that "physically destroy drones with projectiles", which could signal the next procurement.
  • Whether local companies can move from promising prototypes to products with export customers.

Sources

Checked

10 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 6 supported.

Show each claim
  1. Partly supportedThe system approved by NZDF was Danish-made and a jamming system.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “A Cabinet paper from July, just released, charts the approval of New Zealand Defence Force moves to buy a foreign-made system with limited powers”
  2. Partly supportedCabinet papers show that the $2m jammer was approved as an interim fix.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “The papers did not name the system and blanked out all sums but a $2m deal to get a Danish system that Australia uses was announced last month.”
  3. Partly supportedThe $17m accelerator is still to follow the counter-drone system approval.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “An OIA response showed the accelerator was being set up in August”
  4. Partly supported“Stepping stone” is a direct quotation from the source.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “The defence force has landed on a stepping-stone towards getting counter-drone systems that can shoot down drones.”
  5. SupportedThe NZDF has taken a step toward fielding systems that can shoot down drones.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “The defence force has landed on a stepping-stone towards getting counter-drone systems that can shoot down drones.”
  6. SupportedThe system would address the most likely short-term drone threat but not fully protect against advanced, high-intensity threats.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “The new system would cope with the most likely drone threat short term, but not give full protection from the sort of advance or high-intensity drones threats seen in the Ukraine-Russia or Middle East wars, it said.”
  7. SupportedThe Cabinet paper says legislation would need amendment to clarify and broaden legal authority to use the system.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: ““Inter-agency co-ordination and amendment to legislation will be required to clarify and broaden the legal authority to use.””
  8. SupportedThe Cabinet paper says no domestic manufacturer currently meets NZDF’s immediate counter-drone needs.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: ““Analysis shows that no domestic manufacturer currently meets NZDF’s immediate counter-drone” needs, said the Cabinet paper.”
  9. SupportedThe accelerator was allocated $17m over four years.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “Some defence commentators have expressed disappointment at funding of $17m over four years”
  10. SupportedThe system would provide sufficient protection for the army and air force, including RNZAF aircraft and personnel at overseas air bases.RNZ New Zealand Headlines: “It would provide “sufficient protection” for the army and air force - “to protect RNZAF aircraft and personnel at air bases when deployed overseas on operations””

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the World desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source6 of 10 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe