New Zealanders vote on Saturday in an election dominated by the cost of living, global uncertainty, and a young party leader vying to become a new 'kingmaker'. Polling shows a slender margin between Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's ruling National Party and Chris Hipkins' Labour Party, with neither likely to win a majority. Opportunity, led by first-time politician Qiulae Wong, looks set to clear the 5 per cent threshold and could hold the balance of power.
New Zealand's mixed-member proportional voting system means smaller parties can shape who forms government. Since 2023, Luxon's National Party has governed in coalition with ACT and New Zealand First, while Labour has formed a broadly progressive bloc with the Greens and Te Pati Māori. Polling shows neither coalition consistently above 50 per cent.
Opportunity, founded in 2016 by economist Gareth Morgan and previously known as The Opportunities Party (TOP), has never won a seat. Wong, a 38-year-old former KPMG consultant, is described by the Financial Times as arguing that voters are disillusioned with the 'two Chrises,' as Luxon and Hipkins are widely known. She says the party wants to be a 'political circuit-breaker' and work constructively with both sides. 'We still want to grow successful businesses and have a strong economy, but we think we can do that in a way that looks after nature and looks after people.'
Wong, described by The Economist as a 'millennial centrist,' has outlined five bottom lines if her party holds the balance of power: action on anticompetitive behaviour to lower household bills, lobbying and political donation reform, a 10-year plan for funded health care, an end to bottom fish-trawling in some ocean areas, and recommitment to the Paris Agreement. She has also proposed a land value tax of 1.75 per cent on residential land and 0.5 per cent on rural land, which Opportunity says would fund broader tax changes.
Luxon has said National would not partner with Opportunity, while Hipkins has said Labour is more aligned with the party than National. Lowy Institute research fellow Connor Graham says Opportunity has remained pragmatic and said it would negotiate with whoever wins the most votes if it secures its 5 per cent. 'So it could be quite an interesting situation on the weekend where we have two blocs somewhere in the mid- to high-40s, then one kingmaker independent teal party with five strict non-negotiables,' said Connor Graham.
The Greens are enjoying some of their strongest polling in history, with support at about 14.5 per cent. The election takes place against a backdrop of unemployment at its highest since 2015, an economy that has barely grown in three years, housing affordability concerns, and ageing public assets that have raised questions about how to pay for better infrastructure. Parties' foreign policy stances differ, particularly on whether to explore technology co-operation under AUKUS Pillar Two. Graham said the election will be defining for how New Zealand engages with a fast-changing world order and its longstanding 'independent foreign policy mantra'; he contends this has resonance for Australia, which is also wrestling with its place in a changing world and an unpredictable US.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- Opportunity's potential kingmaker role could shift New Zealand's politics toward centrist, evidence-based policy making, with a focus on long-term planning and environmental measures.
- The party's emphasis on land value tax, health funding, and climate action may set a new agenda even if it does not enter government, as major parties adopt some of its ideas.
- The election outcome will shape New Zealand's foreign policy stance, particularly on AUKUS Pillar Two and trade relations with China, affecting regional security dynamics.
Background
New Zealand has a unicameral parliament and holds elections every three years. Since the introduction of MMP in 1996, smaller parties like New Zealand First have frequently held the balance of power. The current contest pits Luxon's centre-right National-led coalition against Hipkins' centre-left Labour-led bloc, with both sides unable to secure a majority in recent polls. Opportunity, originally The Opportunities Party, was founded in 2016 but has never won a seat; it campaigns as a centrist 'circuit-breaker' focused on sustainability and long-term reform.
Key Perspectives
Christopher Luxon (National Party PM): Says his party would not partner with Opportunity.
Chris Hipkins (Labour leader): Says Labour is more aligned with Opportunity than National.
Qiulae Wong (Opportunity leader): Argues voters are disillusioned with the 'two Chrises' and that her party offers a 'political circuit-breaker' with a vision that balances economic growth with caring for nature and people.
Green Party: Polling at about 14.5% under leaders Chloe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson, enjoying some of its strongest support in history.
Connor Graham (Lowy Institute): Says neither bloc is polling over 50%, making Opportunity a potential kingmaker with five non-negotiable conditions; notes the parties differ on AUKUS Pillar Two and that the election will define New Zealand's foreign policy.
What to Watch
- Whether Opportunity clears the 5 per cent threshold and wins seats, and which bloc wins the most votes, determining its negotiating leverage.
- Post-election coalition talks: the 'five non-negotiables' will test whether either major party can meet them without alienating its base.
- New Zealand's position on AUKUS Pillar Two and its broader foreign policy direction, with implications for ties with Australia and the US.
Checked
8 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 6 supported.
Show each claim
- Partly supportedThe Financial Times described Wong as arguing that voters were disillusioned with “two Chrises.”Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: ““Wong sees a chance to upend New Zealand’s political landscape, arguing that voters are disillusioned with ‘the Chrises’,” the paper suggests.”
- Partly supportedWong says Opportunity wants to be a “political circuit-breaker.”Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “It says it is neither left- nor right-wing but wants to act as a “political circuit-breaker”, working constructively with both sides of politics.”
- SupportedThe centrist newcomer could hold the balance of power.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Polling shows a slender margin between the ruling Nationals and Labour, with neither likely to form a majority, while Opportunity seems set to pass the 5 per cent threshold that would entitle it to seats and could deliver the balance of power.”
- SupportedNational and Labour are neck-and-neck, with neither likely to win a majority.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Polling shows a slender margin between the ruling Nationals and Labour, with neither likely to form a majority”
- SupportedOpportunity, led by Qiulae Wong, looks set to clear the 5 per cent threshold.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Opportunity seems set to pass the 5 per cent threshold that would entitle it to seats”
- SupportedNew Zealanders vote on Saturday in an election dominated by cost of living, uncertainty about the world and a young leader vying to be a kingmaker.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “New Zealanders head to the polls on Saturday in an election dominated by the cost of living, how to handle a more uncertain world, and a young party leader vying to become a new “kingmaker”.”
- SupportedOpportunity has never won a seat in parliament.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Opportunity, previously The Opportunities Party (TOP), was founded in 2016 by economist Gareth Morgan and has never won a seat in parliament.”
- SupportedWong’s five bottom lines include action on anticompetitive behaviour, lobbying and donation reform, a 10-year funded health-care plan, restrictions on bottom fish-trawling and recommitment to the Paris Agreement.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Wong, whom The Economist has described as a “millennial centrist”, has outlined five “bottom lines” should her party hold the balance of power: to “bring down bills for Kiwi households” by taking action on anticompetitive behaviour and reforming rules on lobbying and political donations. She also has a 10-year plan for funded health care, seeks an end to bottom fish-trawling in some ocean areas, and a recommitment to the Paris Agreement on climate change.”